Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recognizing and mediating bureaucratic barriers: increasing access to care through small and medium-sized private providers in Kenya.
Suchman, Lauren; Owino, Edward; Montagu, Dominic.
Affiliation
  • Suchman L; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Owino E; Independent Consultant, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Montagu D; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gates Open Res ; 5: 95, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34934905
ABSTRACT

Background:

Equitable access to health services can be constrained in countries where private practitioners make up a large portion of primary care providers, making affordability a challenge. Expanding purchasing arrangements in many countries has helped integrate private providers into government-supported payment schemes and reduced financial barriers to care. However, private providers often must go through an onerous accreditation process to enroll in government-supported financing arrangements. The difficulties of this process can be exacerbated where health policy is changed often and low-level bureaucrats must navigate these shifts at their own discretion, effectively re-interpreting or re-making policy in practice. This paper analyzes one initiative to increase private provider accreditation with social health insurance (SHI) in Kenya by creating an intermediary between providers and SHI officials.

Methods:

This paper draws on 126 semi-structured interviews about SHI accreditation experience with private providers who were members of a franchise network in Kenya. It also draws on four focus group discussions conducted with franchise representatives who provided accreditation support to the providers and served as liaisons between the franchised providers and local SHI offices. There was a total of 20 participants across all four focus groups.

Results:

In a regulatory environment where regulations are weak and impermanent, officials created an accreditation process that was inconsistent and opaque applying rules unevenly, requesting bribes, and minimizing communication with providers. The support provided by the implementing organizations clarified rules, reduced the power of local bureaucrats to apply regulations at their own discretion, gave providers greater confidence in the system, and helped to standardize the accreditation process.

Conclusions:

We conclude that intermediary organizations can mitigate institutional weaknesses, reduce barriers to effective care expansion caused by street-level bureaucrats, and facilitate the adoption of systems which reduce rent-seeking practices that might otherwise delay or derail initiatives to reach universal health coverage.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Gates Open Res Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Gates Open Res Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States