Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Double tract reconstruction versus double flap technique: short-term clinical outcomes after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.
Yu, Byunghyuk; Park, Ki Bum; Park, Ji Yeon; Lee, Seung Soo; Kwon, Oh Kyoung; Chung, Ho Young; Hwang, Yoon Jin.
Affiliation
  • Yu B; Intensive Care Unit, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Park KB; School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JY; Gastric Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, 807 Hoguk-ro, Daegu, 41404, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SS; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Kwon OK; Gastric Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, 807 Hoguk-ro, Daegu, 41404, Republic of Korea.
  • Chung HY; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Hwang YJ; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Surg Endosc ; 36(7): 5243-5256, 2022 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34997340
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) is increasingly preferred for operative management of early gastric cancer, although there is no consensus on a standard reconstruction method after resection. Two popular methods used after LPG are double tract reconstruction (DTR) and double flap technique (DFT). This study assessed comprehensive clinical outcomes including quality of life (QoL) and body composition change 1 year after DFT and DTR.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from 51 to 18 patients who underwent DTR and DFT, respectively, between September 2014 and December 2018. Short-term surgical outcomes, presence of reflux esophagitis, nutritional supplementation, medications, nutritional status (laboratory results and body composition analysis), and QoL measured preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively were compared between both groups.

RESULTS:

Both groups did not differ significantly in clinicopathological characteristics. The DFT as compared to the DTR group required significantly longer time for anastomosis (79.4 vs. 60.9 min, p < 0.001) and use of fewer staplers (3.39 vs. 6.86, p < 0.001). While the presence of endoscopic reflux esophagitis and iron/vitamin B12 replacement were comparable, the DTR group showed a higher tendency of taking anti-reflux medications for reflux symptoms (DTR 13.7% vs. DFT 0.0%, p = 0.177). The DTR group lost significantly more weight (p = 0.038) and body fat (p = 0.009). QoL analysis showed significant deterioration in diarrhea, eating restriction, and taste problems in both groups (DTR group p = 0.008, p < 0.001, p = 0.010, respectively, and DFT group p = 0.017, p = 0.024, p = 0.034, respectively). However, only the DTR group showed significant deterioration in physical function (p = 0.009), role function (p = 0.033), nausea/vomiting (p = 0.041), appetite loss (p = 0.019), dysphagia (p = 0.001), pain (p = 0.025), and body image (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite requiring a longer anastomosis time, performing DFT after LPG was shown to be an ideal reconstruction method in terms of better 1-year QoL and nutritional outcome. Further larger studies over longer postoperative periods are necessary to confirm our findings.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / Esophagitis, Peptic / Laparoscopy Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / Esophagitis, Peptic / Laparoscopy Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article