Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterizing Negative Online Reviews of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Richman, Evan H; Ogbaudu, Ewoma; Pollock, Jordan R; Brinkman, Joseph C; Moore, Michael Lane; Arthur, Jaymeson R; Karlen, Judson W.
Affiliation
  • Richman EH; Creighton University School of Medicine-Phoenix Regional Campus.
  • Ogbaudu E; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ.
  • Pollock JR; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ.
  • Brinkman JC; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.
  • Moore ML; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ.
  • Arthur JR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.
  • Karlen JW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 42(5): e533-e537, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35200216
BACKGROUND: The growing focus on subjective patient experiences has created an increase in popularity for physician rating websites. The purpose of this study was to characterize extremely negative reviews of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Pediatric orthopaedic surgeons were randomly selected using the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America comprehensive list of surgeons. A search was then performed on Healthgrades.com, Vitals.com, and Yelp.com for 1-star reviews. Reviews were classified into clinical and nonclinical categories. Statistical analyses were performed regarding the frequency of reviews and complaints for each respective category. RESULTS: Of the 279 one-star reviews categorized, 248 reviews (88.9% of reviews) included nonclinical complaints, and 182 reviews (65.2% of reviews) included clinical complaints. Nonsurgical patients were associated with 255 reviews, and the remaining 24 were related to surgical patients. Of the 430 comments within reviews, 248 referenced nonclinical aspects of care, and 182 referenced clinical care. Clinical factors most frequently noted included clinical disagreement (37%), unclear treatment plan (25%), complication (17%), misdiagnosis (15%), uncontrolled pain (13%), and delay in care (8%). The most addressed nonclinical factors included physician bedside manner (68%), time spent with provider (21%), wait time (18%), unprofessional staff (17%), scheduling issues (9%), cost (8%), and billing (8%). Compared with surgical reviews, nonsurgical reviews were more likely to contain nonclinical complaints (rate ratio: 1.5; P<0.05) and less likely to contain clinical complaints (rate ratio: 0.7; P<0.05). The most common complaint by surgical patients was complications (91.7%). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the factors associated with negative reviews of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. The majority of reviews of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons were left by nonsurgical patients and were related to nonclinical aspects of care. We also found surgeon-dependent factors such as poor physician bedside manner, unclear treatment plan, or parents' disagreement with treatment plan were the most common reasons for negative reviews. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / Surgeons / Orthopedic Surgeons Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / Surgeons / Orthopedic Surgeons Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Year: 2022 Type: Article