Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variations in uterine closure technique: an institutional survey of obstetricians and implications for patient counseling and prevention of adverse sequelae.
Antoine, Clarel; Alexander, Jameshisa S; Yaghoubian, Yasaman C; Harary, Joyce M.
Affiliation
  • Antoine C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Alexander JS; Compassionate Ob/Gyn Care PLLC, New York, NY, USA.
  • Yaghoubian YC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital/Long Island Jewish Medical, New York, NY, USA.
  • Harary JM; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, NY, USA.
J Perinat Med ; 50(8): 1045-1052, 2022 Oct 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35538677
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the diversity of uterine closure techniques (UCTs) among providers in one institution and evaluate concurrent consideration of adverse outcomes for patient counseling, provisional care, and prevention.

METHODS:

Forty-four obstetricians at NYU Langone Health were emailed a survey of their uterine closure technique, patient counseling, and practice experience. Results were stratified by years of practice ≤5, 5-20, and 20-40 years.

RESULTS:

Thirty-nine obstetricians (88.6%) completed the survey. Among those, a blunt uterine opening was preferred by 29 (74.4%), and a mid-lower segment location was favored by 34 (87.2%). At uterine closure, the endometrium was included by 20 (51.3%), with half a centimeter or more incorporated in the myometrial closure, whereas 15 (38.5%) did not factor in the endometrium's presence. Closure duration varied from 1 to 20 min, with 21 (53.9%) lasting 1-5 min and 12 (30.8%) lasting 5-10 min. All physicians were familiar with the potential post-cesarean complications and counseled their patients accordingly; 25 (64.1%) at the first post-op visit while 14 (35.9%) did so before the next conception. Practitioners with fewer years in practice endorsed the safety of up to five consecutive cesarean births, while those with more experience approved up to ten. Thirty-two obstetricians (82.1%) stated that the risk of abnormal placentation is exclusively associated with the number of cesarean sections, whereas five (12.8%) senior obstetricians asserted that individual surgical techniques are most impactful.

CONCLUSIONS:

The survey illustrates that various UCTs are performed irrespective of potential adverse sequelae and without consideration for subsequent patient counseling and care. Ongoing research must study the impact of UCT on scar healing to formulate preventive strategies for post-cesarean complications.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / Suture Techniques Type of study: Etiology_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Perinat Med Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / Suture Techniques Type of study: Etiology_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Perinat Med Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States