Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shared decision-making in Canada: Update on integration of evidence in health decisions and patient-centred care government mandates.
Légaré, France; Stacey, Dawn; Forest, Pierre-Gerlier; Archambault, Patrick; Boland, Laura; Coutu, Marie-France; Giguère, Anik M C; LeBlanc, Annie; Lewis, Krystina B; Witteman, Holly O.
Affiliation
  • Légaré F; VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Quebec City, Canada;
  • Stacey D; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Forest PG; School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Archambault P; VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Quebec City, Canada;
  • Boland L; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Coutu MF; Centre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation affiliated with Hôpital Charles-Lemoyne Research Center, Rehabilitation School, Longueuil Campus - Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada.
  • Giguère AMC; VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Quebec City, Canada;
  • LeBlanc A; VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Quebec City, Canada.
  • Lewis KB; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Witteman HO; VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Quebec City, Canada;
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes ; 171: 22-29, 2022 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606312
In Canada, government mandates for patient-centred care (PCC) vary across the 10 provinces and three territories. Although basic medical and hospital services are provided for all, health care options for patients also depend on having private insurance. Thus, the current design of the Canadian healthcare system has several implications for PCC and shared decision-making (SDM). Since 2007, this is our fourth update on SDM in Canada. The aim of this paper is to provide an update on the current state of SDM and patient and public involvement in Canada. Overall, we still observed the difficulty of implementing any sort of national strategy partly because of the decentralized nature of the healthcare system. Second, national professional education programs are complicated by licensure and scope of practice variations across jurisdictions. Third, there are variations in the availability of different options covered by universal healthcare. Canada has experienced some favorable development as PCC is now explicitly articulated in the policies of most provinces and territories and there are increased efforts to give patients more access to their electronic health records. However, patient and public engagement (PPE) reform in health programs and governance remains an exception, and continuing centralization of governance structures may reduce their responsiveness to patient priorities. In a 2018 survey, 47.2% of respondents reported that they were not told by their health professional that they had a choice about treatment. Nonetheless, decision aids and decision coaching are increasingly available for health-related decisions and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute's decision aid inventory has ensured continued leadership in this area. Diverse jurisdictions are starting to embed decision aids into care pathways, with some decision aids being included in clinical practice guidelines. The COVID-19 pandemic may have had a negative impact on SDM by removing decision choices due to emergency public health mandates, but stimulated new research and decision aids. Canada continues to assign health research funding to SDM and PCC, and a program dedicated to patient-oriented research is central to this effort. Guides and frameworks are increasingly available for planning and evaluating PPE. Finally, various initiatives are attempting to involve and empower Indigenous peoples through PPE and SDM.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Making / COVID-19 Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte / Europa Language: En Journal: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Making / COVID-19 Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte / Europa Language: En Journal: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2022 Type: Article