Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Propranolol Prophylaxis on Headache Frequency in Children with Migraine Without Aura: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Keerthana, D; Mishra, Devendra; Chauhan, Meenakshi Kanwar; Juneja, Monica.
Affiliation
  • Keerthana D; Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College (University of Delhi), Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, 110002, India. keerthanadhanapaul31@gmail.com.
  • Mishra D; Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College (University of Delhi), Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, 110002, India.
  • Chauhan MK; Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research (Constituent Institute of DPSR - University), New Delhi, India.
  • Juneja M; Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College (University of Delhi), Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, 110002, India.
Indian J Pediatr ; 90(9): 880-885, 2023 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35867273
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of propranolol prophylaxis with placebo on headache frequency in children with migraine over the 3-mo follow-up. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial children aged 6-12 y with newly diagnosed migraine without aura as per the International Classification for Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria were enroled. They were randomized to the intervention group receiving oral propranolol (1-3 mg/kg/d, BID) and the control group receiving a similar looking, inert, oral placebo for migraine prophylaxis for 3 mo. The number of migraine attacks over the 3-mo follow-up (using a headache diary) was the primary outcome. Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (PedMIDAS) was used for assessing disability and Visual analogue scale was used for assessing headache severity. Analysis was done on intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Twenty children (10 in each group) completed the study. The two groups were similar at baseline. Both the study drugs produced significant reduction of headache frequency after the study intervention (p = 0.002). However, there was no difference between the two groups with respect to either the median (IQR) number of headache attacks [22 (20, 25) vs. 14 (10, 20); p = 0.05], headache severity [1 (0, 1) vs. 0.5 (0, 1); p = 0.48] or migraine disability [39.5 (28, 44) vs. 35 (22, 38); p = 0.27]. Adverse effects were higher in the intervention group (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol was effective for migraine prophylaxis in children but the effect was not higher than placebo. Larger placebo-controlled trials of propranolol need to be conducted to decide its place in migraine prophylaxis in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thailand Clinical Trials Registry; TCTR20200621001.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Propranolol / Migraine without Aura Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Indian J Pediatr Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Propranolol / Migraine without Aura Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Indian J Pediatr Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: India