Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated with curative esophagectomy: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Gu, Yi-Min; Yang, Yu-Shang; Shi, Gui-Dong; Yan, Cheng-Yi; Shang, Qi-Xin; Zhang, Han-Lu; Wang, Wen-Ping; Yuan, Yong; Chen, Long-Qi.
Affiliation
  • Gu YM; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Yang YS; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Shi GD; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Yan CY; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Changsha Central Hospital, University of South China, Changsha, China.
  • Shang QX; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Zhang HL; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Wang WP; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Yuan Y; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Chen LQ; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
J Surg Oncol ; 126(8): 1396-1402, 2022 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36036894
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of surgery in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) and explore potential prognostic factors.

METHODS:

We screened patients with SCCE who underwent esophagectomy from 2010 to 2018 at three institutes. Differences in survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS:

A total of 69 patients were included. Multivariate analysis showed that TNM stage (hazard ratio [HR] 4.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-10.75, p = 0.004) and adjuvant therapy (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16-0.51, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB disease were merged into the surgery response disease (SRD), whereas stage III disease into the surgery nonresponse disease (SNRD). The SRD group had significantly improved survival compared to the SNRD group (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.58, p < 0.001). In addition, adjuvant therapy increased survival benefit in the SNRD group (p < 0.001) but not in the SRD group (p = 0.061).

CONCLUSIONS:

Surgery alone appears to be adequate for disease control in the SRD group, whereas multimodality therapy was associated with improved survival in the SNRD group.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Small Cell Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Surg Oncol Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Small Cell Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Surg Oncol Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: China