Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices for implant screw tightening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A consensus is lacking on the accuracy of torque value on different types of mechanical torque-limiting devices. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the accuracy of unused mechanical torque-limiting devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted until October 2021 in 6 electronic databases. Relevant articles were manually screened in 5 journals from January 2000 to October 2021. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted the data independently. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the weighted mean difference in torque value deviation from target torque between spring-style and friction-style devices as a primary outcome. Deviations of output torque value from target value in spring-style or friction-style devices were also analyzed as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 11 595 articles were identified, and 16 articles were included for final statistical analysis. Meta-analysis of the included articles showed that torque value deviation in the spring-style was significantly lower than in the friction-style devices (-0.99 Ncm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-1.89, -0.09], P=.030). Deviations of output torque value from target value was -0.54 Ncm in the spring-style group (CI: [-1.23, 0.15], P=.122) and -0.18 Ncm in the friction-style group (95% CI: [-1.40, 1.04], P=.770). Meta-regression analysis indicated that target value was significantly associated with the mean deviation from target value only in the spring-style group. High heterogeneity was found, suggesting more studies with standardized research design are required. CONCLUSIONS: Both spring- and friction-style mechanical torque-limiting devices can produce relatively accurate torque values; however, unused spring-type devices tend to have lower deviation from target torque value than unused friction-type devices.