Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Drivers of prohibited natural resource collection in Chitwan National Park, Nepal.
Yabiku, Scott T; Sullivan, Abigail; York, Abigail M; Zhao, Qunshan; Glick, Jennifer E; Hall, Sharon J; Ghimire, Dirgha J; An, Li.
Affiliation
  • Yabiku ST; Penn State University, 306 Oswald Tower, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
  • Sullivan A; Boston University Earth & Environment, 685 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
  • York AM; School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
  • Zhao Q; Urban Big Data Centre 7-302, 7 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
  • Glick JE; Penn State University, 601 Oswald Tower, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
  • Hall SJ; School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
  • Ghimire DJ; Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.
  • An L; San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-4493, USA.
Environ Conserv ; 49(2): 114-121, 2022 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36246571
Protected areas (PAs) are critical for achieving conservation, economic and development goals, but the factors that lead households to engage in prohibited resource collection in PAs are not well understood. We examine collection behaviours in community forests and the protected Chitwan National Park in Chitwan, Nepal. Our approach incorporates household and ecological data, including structured interviews, spatially explicit data on collection behaviours measured with computer tablets and a systematic field survey of invasive species. We pair our data with a framework that considers factors related to a household's demand for resources, barriers to prohibited resource collection, barriers to legal resource collection and alternatives to resource collection. The analysis identifies key drivers of prohibited collection, including sociodemographic variables and perceptions of an invasive plant (Mikania micrantha). The social-ecological systems approach reveals that household perceptions of the presence of M. micrantha were more strongly associated with resource collection decisions than the actual ecologically measured presence of the plant. We explore the policy implications of our findings for PAs and propose that employing a social-ecological systems approach leads to conservation policy and scientific insights that are not possible to achieve with social or ecological approaches alone.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Environ Conserv Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Environ Conserv Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States