Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of blood transfusion services in low-resource countries.
Patidar, Gopal K; Thachil, Jecko; Dhiman, Yashaswi; Oreh, Adaeze; Vrielink, Hans; van den Berg, Karin; Grubovic Rastvorceva, Rada M; So-Osman, Cynthia; Al-Riyami, Arwa Z.
Affiliation
  • Patidar GK; Department of Transfusion Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Thachil J; Department of Haematology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
  • Dhiman Y; Department of Immunohematology & Blood Transfusion, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India.
  • Oreh A; Department of Planning, Research and Statistics, National Blood Service Commission, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Vrielink H; Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • van den Berg K; Department of Transfusion medicine, Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Grubovic Rastvorceva RM; Translational Research Department, Medical Division, South African National Blood Service, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
  • So-Osman C; Medical Division, South African National Blood Service, Roodepoort, South Africa.
  • Al-Riyami AZ; Division of Clinical Haematology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Vox Sang ; 117(12): 1375-1383, 2022 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36349461
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Enabling universal access to safe blood components should be a key component of every country's national healthcare strategy. This study aimed to assess the current status of infrastructure and resources of blood transfusion services (BTS) in low- and middle-income countries. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey was designed to gather information on blood donations, components, redistribution, testing resources and quality management systems (QMSs). The survey was distributed to the International Society of Blood Transfusion members between October 2021 and November 2021.

RESULTS:

A total of 54 respondents from 20 countries responded to the survey. This included hospital-based BTS/blood centres (46%), national blood centres (11%)and national and regional blood services (11%). Voluntary non-remunerated, replacement and paid donors accounted for 94.2%, 84.6% and 21.1% of donations, respectively. Apheresis donation was available in 59.6% of institutions. National/regional criteria for redistribution of blood components were reported by 75.9% of respondents. Blood components incurred payment charges in 81.5% of respondents' institutions, and payments were borne by patients in 50% of them. Testing methods, such as manual (83%), semi-automated (68%) or fully automated (36.2%), were used either alone or in combination. QMSs were reported in 17 institutions, while accreditation and haemovigilance were reported in 12 and 8 countries, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

QMS was implemented in most of the countries despite the common use of paid donations and the lack of advanced testing. Efforts to overcome persistent challenges and wider implementation of patient blood management programmes are required.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Component Removal / Blood Donors Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Vox Sang Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Component Removal / Blood Donors Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Vox Sang Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: India