Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tumor Location and a Tumor Volume over 2.8 cc Predict the Prognosis for Japanese Localized Prostate Cancer.
Baba, Haruki; Sakamoto, Shinichi; Zhao, Xue; Yamada, Yasutaka; Rii, Junryo; Fujimoto, Ayumi; Kanesaka, Manato; Takeuchi, Nobuyoshi; Sazuka, Tomokazu; Imamura, Yusuke; Akakura, Koichiro; Ichikawa, Tomohiko.
Affiliation
  • Baba H; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Sakamoto S; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Zhao X; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Yamada Y; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Rii J; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Fujimoto A; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Kanesaka M; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Takeuchi N; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Sazuka T; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Imamura Y; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
  • Akakura K; Department of Urology, Japan Community Health-Care Organization Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, Tokyo 162-8543, Japan.
  • Ichikawa T; Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(23)2022 Nov 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36497304
ABSTRACT
(1)

Objective:

Our study investigated the prognostic value of tumor volume and location in prostate cancer patients who received radical prostatectomy (RP). (2)

Methods:

The prognostic significance of tumor volume and location, together with other clinical factors, was studied using 557 patients who received RP. (3)

Results:

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified the optimal cutoff value of tumor volume as 2.8 cc for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR). Cox regression analysis revealed that a tumor in the posterior area (p = 0.031), peripheral zone (p = 0.0472), and tumor volume ≥ 2.8 cc (p < 0.0001) were predictive factors in univariate analysis. After multivariate analysis, tumor volume ≥ 2.8 cc (p = 0.0225) was an independent predictive factor for BCR. Among them, a novel risk model was established using tumor volume and location in the posterior area and peripheral zone. The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who met the three criteria (unfavorable group) was significantly worse than other groups (p ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the unfavorable risk was an independent prognostic factor for BCR. The prognostic significance of our risk model was observed in low- to intermediate-risk patients, although it was not observed in high-risk patients. (4)

Conclusion:

Tumor volume (≥2.8 cc) and localization (posterior/peripheral zone) may be a novel prognostic factor in patients undergoing RP.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Cancers (Basel) Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Cancers (Basel) Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan