Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using cognitive interviews to improve a measure of organizational readiness for implementation.
McClam, Maria; Workman, Lauren; Dias, Emanuelle M; Walker, Timothy J; Brandt, Heather M; Craig, Derek W; Gibson, Robert; Lamont, Andrea; Weiner, Bryan J; Wandersman, Abraham; Fernandez, Maria E.
Affiliation
  • McClam M; Center for Applied Research and Evaluation, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. zubizarr@mailbox.sc.edu.
  • Workman L; Center for Applied Research and Evaluation, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Dias EM; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Walker TJ; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Brandt HM; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Craig DW; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
  • Gibson R; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Lamont A; Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Weiner BJ; Wandersman Center, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Wandersman A; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Fernandez ME; Wandersman Center, Columbia, SC, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 93, 2023 Jan 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36707829
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Organizational readiness is a key factor for successful implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), but a valid and reliable measure to assess readiness across contexts and settings is needed. The R = MC2 heuristic posits that organizational readiness stems from an organization's motivation, capacity to implement a specific innovation, and its general capacity. This paper describes a process used to examine the face and content validity of items in a readiness survey developed to assess organizational readiness (based on R = MC2) among federally qualified health centers (FQHC) implementing colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) EBIs.

METHODS:

We conducted 20 cognitive interviews with FQHC staff (clinical and non-clinical) in South Carolina and Texas. Participants were provided a subset of items from the readiness survey to review. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to elicit feedback from participants using "think aloud" and probing techniques. Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling approach and interviews were conducted virtually using Zoom and WebEx. Participants were asked 1) about the relevancy of items, 2) how they interpreted the meaning of items or specific terms, 3) to identify items that were difficult to understand, and 4) how items could be improved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded in ATLAS.ti. Findings were used to revise the readiness survey.

RESULTS:

Key recommendations included reducing the survey length and removing redundant or difficult to understand items. Additionally, participants recommended using consistent terms throughout (e.g., other units/teams vs. departments) the survey and changing pronouns (e.g., people, we) to be more specific (e.g., leadership, staff). Moreover, participants recommended specifying ambiguous terms (e.g., define what "better" means).

CONCLUSION:

Use of cognitive interviews allowed for an engaged process to refine an existing measure of readiness. The improved and finalized readiness survey can be used to support and improve implementation of CRCS EBIs in the clinic setting and thus reduce the cancer burden and cancer-related health disparities.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Motivation / Neoplasms Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Motivation / Neoplasms Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States