Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
BRASD trial: biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation-a randomized multicenter clinical trial.
Baden, David N; Roetman, Martijn H; Boeije, Tom; Mullaart, Nieke; Boden, Ralph; Houwert, Roderick M; Heng, Marilyn; Groenwold, Rolf H H; van der Meijden, Olivier A J.
Affiliation
  • Baden DN; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands. dnbaden@gmail.com.
  • Roetman MH; Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands.
  • Boeije T; Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn, The Netherlands.
  • Mullaart N; Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn, The Netherlands.
  • Boden R; Bravis Ziekenhuis, Bergen op Zoom and Roosendaal, The Netherlands.
  • Houwert RM; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Heng M; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  • Groenwold RHH; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • van der Meijden OAJ; Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Emerg Med ; 16(1): 14, 2023 Feb 24.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36829126
BACKGROUND: Biomechanical reduction techniques for shoulder dislocations have demonstrated high reduction success rates with a limited pain experience for the patient. We postulated that the combination of biomechanical reduction techniques with the shortest length of stay would also have the lowest pain experience and the highest first reduction success rate. METHODS: A randomized multicenter clinical trial was performed to compare different biomechanical reduction techniques in treating anterior shoulder dislocations without the use of invasive pain relief. Patients who were able to perform adduction of the arm were randomly assigned to Cunningham, the modified Milch, and the scapular manipulation technique. Those who were not able to do so were randomly assigned to modified Milch and the scapular manipulation technique. Primary outcomes were emergency department length of stay and pain experienced during the reduction process, measured by the numeric pain rating scale. Secondary outcomes were reduction time, reduction success, use of analgesics or sedatives, and complications. RESULTS: Three hundred eight patients were included, of whom 134 were in the adduction group. In both groups, no differences in emergency department length of stay and experienced pain were observed between the treatment arms. In the adduction group, the modified Milch technique had the highest first reduction success rates 52% (p = 0.016), within protocol 61% (p = 0.94), and with sedation in the ED 100% ( -). In the no-adduction group, the modified Milch was also the most successful primary reduction technique with 51% success (p = 0.040), within protocol 66% (p = 0.90), and with sedation in the ED 98% (p = 0.93). No complications were recorded in any of the techniques. CONCLUSION: A combination of biomechanical techniques resulted in a similar length of stay in the emergency department and showed similar pain scores with an overall high success rate of reduction. In both groups, the modified Milch had the highest first-reduction success rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR5839-1 April 2016. Ethical committee Noord-Holland with the CCMO-number NL54173.094.15.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Language: En Journal: Int J Emerg Med Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Language: En Journal: Int J Emerg Med Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands