Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Refining epigenetic prediction of chronological and biological age.
Bernabeu, Elena; McCartney, Daniel L; Gadd, Danni A; Hillary, Robert F; Lu, Ake T; Murphy, Lee; Wrobel, Nicola; Campbell, Archie; Harris, Sarah E; Liewald, David; Hayward, Caroline; Sudlow, Cathie; Cox, Simon R; Evans, Kathryn L; Horvath, Steve; McIntosh, Andrew M; Robinson, Matthew R; Vallejos, Catalina A; Marioni, Riccardo E.
Affiliation
  • Bernabeu E; Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • McCartney DL; Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Gadd DA; Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Hillary RF; Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Lu AT; Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Murphy L; Altos Labs, San Diego, USA.
  • Wrobel N; Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Campbell A; Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Harris SE; Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Liewald D; Department of Psychology, Lothian Birth Cohorts, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Hayward C; Department of Psychology, Lothian Birth Cohorts, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Sudlow C; Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Cox SR; Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Evans KL; Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Horvath S; BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
  • McIntosh AM; Edinburgh Medical School, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Robinson MR; Department of Psychology, Lothian Birth Cohorts, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Vallejos CA; Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Marioni RE; Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Genome Med ; 15(1): 12, 2023 02 28.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36855161
BACKGROUND: Epigenetic clocks can track both chronological age (cAge) and biological age (bAge). The latter is typically defined by physiological biomarkers and risk of adverse health outcomes, including all-cause mortality. As cohort sample sizes increase, estimates of cAge and bAge become more precise. Here, we aim to develop accurate epigenetic predictors of cAge and bAge, whilst improving our understanding of their epigenomic architecture. METHODS: First, we perform large-scale (N = 18,413) epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) of chronological age and all-cause mortality. Next, to create a cAge predictor, we use methylation data from 24,674 participants from the Generation Scotland study, the Lothian Birth Cohorts (LBC) of 1921 and 1936, and 8 other cohorts with publicly available data. In addition, we train a predictor of time to all-cause mortality as a proxy for bAge using the Generation Scotland cohort (1214 observed deaths). For this purpose, we use epigenetic surrogates (EpiScores) for 109 plasma proteins and the 8 component parts of GrimAge, one of the current best epigenetic predictors of survival. We test this bAge predictor in four external cohorts (LBC1921, LBC1936, the Framingham Heart Study and the Women's Health Initiative study). RESULTS: Through the inclusion of linear and non-linear age-CpG associations from the EWAS, feature pre-selection in advance of elastic net regression, and a leave-one-cohort-out (LOCO) cross-validation framework, we obtain cAge prediction with a median absolute error equal to 2.3 years. Our bAge predictor was found to slightly outperform GrimAge in terms of the strength of its association to survival (HRGrimAge = 1.47 [1.40, 1.54] with p = 1.08 × 10-52, and HRbAge = 1.52 [1.44, 1.59] with p = 2.20 × 10-60). Finally, we introduce MethylBrowsR, an online tool to visualise epigenome-wide CpG-age associations. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of multiple large datasets, EpiScores, non-linear DNAm effects, and new approaches to feature selection has facilitated improvements to the blood-based epigenetic prediction of biological and chronological age.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Epigenomics / Epigenome Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Genome Med Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Epigenomics / Epigenome Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Genome Med Year: 2023 Type: Article