Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Uptake, experiences and barriers to cervical screening for trans and non-binary people in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Carroll, Rona; Tan, Kyle K H; Ker, Alex; Byrne, Jack L; Veale, Jaimie F.
Affiliation
  • Carroll R; Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Tan KKH; Trans Health Research Lab, School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  • Ker A; Faculty of Maori and Indigenous Studies, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  • Byrne JL; School of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Veale JF; Trans Health Research Lab, School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 63(3): 448-453, 2023 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37005094
ABSTRACT
Little is known about experiences and barriers for trans and non-binary (TGNB) people eligible for cervical screening in Aotearoa New Zealand.

AIMS:

To identify uptake, barriers and reasons for delaying cervical cancer screening among TGNB people in Aotearoa. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The 2018 Counting Ourselves data on TGNB people assigned female at birth aged 20-69 years who had ever had sex, were analysed to report on experiences of those who were eligible for cervical screening (n = 318). Participants answered questions about whether they had taken part in cervical screening and reasons behind any delays in receiving the test.

RESULTS:

Trans men were more likely than non-binary participants to report that they did not require cervical screening or were unsure if they needed it. For those who had delayed cervical screening, 30% did so due to feeling worried about how they would be treated as a trans or non-binary person and 35% due to another reason. Other reasons for delay related to general and gender-related discomfort, previous traumatic experiences, anxiety or fear of the test and pain. Material barriers to access included cost and lack of information.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current cervical screening program in Aotearoa does not consider the needs of TGNB people, leading to delayed and reduced uptake of cervical screening. Health providers require education on the reasons TGNB people delay or avoid cervical screening in order to provide appropriate information and affirmative healthcare environments. The human papillomavirus self-swab may address some of the existing barriers.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Transsexualism / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Transgender Persons Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: New Zealand

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Transsexualism / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Transgender Persons Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: New Zealand