Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: Does Use of a Video Laryngoscope Facilitate Both Steps of the Procedure?
Prekker, Matthew E; Trent, Stacy A; Lofrano, Arianna; Russell, Derek W; Barnes, Christopher R; Brewer, Joseph M; Doerschug, Kevin C; Gaillard, John P; Gandotra, Sheetal; Ginde, Adit A; Ghamande, Shekhar; Gibbs, Kevin W; Hughes, Christopher G; Janz, David R; Khan, Akram; Mitchell, Steven H; Page, David B; Rice, Todd W; Self, Wesley H; Smith, Lane M; Stempek, Susan B; Vonderhaar, Derek J; West, Jason R; Whitson, Micah R; Casey, Jonathan D; Semler, Matthew W; Driver, Brian E.
Affiliation
  • Prekker ME; Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN. Electronic address: Matthew.Prekker@hcmed.org.
  • Trent SA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, CO.
  • Lofrano A; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Russell DW; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Pulmonary Section, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Barnes CR; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
  • Brewer JM; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
  • Doerschug KC; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
  • Gaillard JP; Department of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Gandotra S; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
  • Ginde AA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Ghamande S; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Disease, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX.
  • Gibbs KW; Section on Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Immunology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Hughes CG; Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Anesthesia Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Janz DR; University Medical Center New Orleans and the Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine and Allergy/Immunology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
  • Khan A; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR.
  • Mitchell SH; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
  • Page DB; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
  • Rice TW; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Self WH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Smith LM; Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates, Atrium Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
  • Stempek SB; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.
  • Vonderhaar DJ; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA.
  • West JR; Department of Emergency Medicine, Lincoln Medical Center, The Bronx, New York City, NY.
  • Whitson MR; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Casey JD; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Semler MW; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Driver BE; Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Ann Emerg Med ; 82(4): 425-431, 2023 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37028995
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the effect of the use of a video laryngoscope versus a direct laryngoscope on each step of emergency intubation laryngoscopy (step 1) and intubation of the trachea (step 2).

METHODS:

In a secondary observational analysis of data from 2 multicenter, randomized trials that enrolled critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation but did not control for laryngoscope type (video laryngoscope vs direct laryngoscope), we fit mixed-effects logistic regression models examining the 1) the association between laryngoscope type (video laryngoscope vs direct laryngoscope) and the Cormack-Lehane grade of view and 2) the interaction between grade of view, laryngoscope type (video laryngoscope vs direct laryngoscope), and the incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt.

RESULTS:

We analyzed 1,786 patients 467 (26.2%) in the direct laryngoscope group and 1,319 (73.9%) in the video laryngoscope group. The use of a video laryngoscope was associated with an improved grade of view as compared with a direct laryngoscope (adjusted odds ratio for increasingly favorable grade of view 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.47 to 3.99). Successful intubation on the first attempt occurred in 83.2% of patients in the video laryngoscope group and 72.2% of patients in the direct laryngoscope group (absolute difference 11.1%, 95% CI 6.5% to 15.6%). Video laryngoscope use modified the association between grade of view and successful intubation on the first attempt such that intubation on the first attempt was similar between video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope at a grade 1 view and higher for video laryngoscope than direct laryngoscope at grade 2 to 4 views (P<.001 for interaction term).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, the use of a video laryngoscope was associated both with a better view of the vocal cords and with a higher probability of successfully intubating the trachea when the view of the vocal cords was incomplete in this observational analysis. However, a multicenter, randomized trial directly comparing the effect of a video laryngoscope with a direct laryngoscope on the grade of view, success, and complications is needed.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laryngoscopes / Laryngoscopy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Emerg Med Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laryngoscopes / Laryngoscopy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Emerg Med Year: 2023 Type: Article