Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures and Outcomes for Recent and Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

ABSTRACT

Although the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an established treatment for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), relevant guidelines do not recommend it for recent-STEMI cases with a totally occluded infarcted related artery (IRA). However, PCI is allowed in Japan for recent-STEMI cases, but little is known regarding its outcomes. We aimed to examine the details and outcomes of PCI procedures in recent-STEMI cases with a totally occluded IRA and compared the findings with those in acute-STEMI cases.Among the 903 consecutive patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome, 250 were treated with PCI for type I STEMI with a totally occluded IRA. According to the time between symptom onset and diagnosis, patients were divided into the recent-STEMI (n = 32) and acute-STEMI (n = 218) groups. The background, procedure details, and short-term outcomes were analyzed. No significant differences between the groups were noted regarding patient demographics, acute myocardial infarction severity, or IRA distribution. Although the stent number and type were similar, significant differences were observed among PCI procedures, including the number of guidewires used, rate of microcatheter or double-lumen catheter use, and application rate of thrombus aspiration. The thrombolysis rate in the myocardial infarction flow 3-grade post-PCI did not differ significantly between the groups. Both groups had a low frequency of procedure-related complications. The in-hospital mortality rates were 0% and 4.6% in the recent-STEMI and acute-STEMI groups, respectively (P > 0.05).Although recent-STEMI cases required complicated PCI techniques, their safety, success rate, and in-hospital mortality were comparable to those of acute-STEMI cases.