Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of Sociodemographic Information in Clinical Vignettes of Multiple-Choice Questions for Preclinical Medical Students.
Carey-Ewend, Kelly; Feinberg, Amir; Flen, Alexis; Williamson, Clark; Gutierrez, Carmen; Cykert, Samuel; Beck Dallaghan, Gary L; Gilliland, Kurt O.
Affiliation
  • Carey-Ewend K; Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
  • Feinberg A; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
  • Flen A; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
  • Williamson C; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
  • Gutierrez C; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
  • Cykert S; Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
  • Beck Dallaghan GL; University of Texas at Tyler School of Medicine, Tyler, TX USA.
  • Gilliland KO; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
Med Sci Educ ; 33(3): 659-667, 2023 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37501800
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

This paper aims to characterize the use of demographic data in multiple-choice questions from a commercial preclinical question bank and determine if there is appropriate use of different distractors.

Background:

Multiple-choice questions for medical students often include vignettes describing a patient's presentation to help guide students to a diagnosis, but overall patterns of usage between different types of nonmedical patient information in question stems have yet to be determined.

Methods:

Three hundred eighty of 453 randomly selected questions were included for analysis after determining they contained a clinical vignette and required a diagnosis. The vignettes and following explanations were then examined for the presence/absence of 11 types of demographic information, including age, sex/gender, and socioeconomic status. We compared both the usage frequency and relevance between the 11 information types.

Results:

Most information types were present in less than 10% of clinical vignettes, but age and sex/gender were present in over 95% of question stems. Over 50% of questions included irrelevant information about age and sex/gender, but 75% of questions did not include any irrelevant information of other types. Patient weight and environmental exposures were significantly more likely to be relevant than age or sex/gender.

Discussion:

Students using the questions in this study will frequently gain practice incorporating age and sex/gender into their clinical reasoning while receiving little exposure to other demographic information. Based on our findings, we posit that questions could include more irrelevant information, outside age and sex/gender, to better approximate real clinical scenarios and ensure students do not overvalue certain demographic data. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01778-z.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Med Sci Educ Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Med Sci Educ Year: 2023 Type: Article