Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Compressed SENSE on Image Quality and Reduction of MRI Acquisition Time: A Clinical Validation Study.
Seow, Pohchoo; Kheok, Si Wei; Png, Meng Ai; Chai, Pik Hsien; Yan, Timothy Song Tian; Tan, Eu Jin; Liauw, Lishya; Law, Yan Mee; Anand, Chidambaram Viswanath; Lee, Weiling; Chen, Robert Chun; Lim, Kheng Choon; Chan, Lai Peng; Mohan, P Chandra.
Affiliation
  • Seow P; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore. Electronic address: swpohchoo@gmail.com.
  • Kheok SW; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Png MA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Chai PH; Radiography Department, Singapore General Hospital, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Yan TST; Radiography Department, Singapore General Hospital, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Tan EJ; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Liauw L; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Law YM; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Anand CV; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Lee W; Radiography Department, Singapore General Hospital, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Chen RC; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Lim KC; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Chan LP; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
  • Mohan PC; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, 31, Third Hospital Ave, Central Region, Singapore 168753; Duke-NUS Medical School, Central Region, Singapore.
Acad Radiol ; 31(3): 956-965, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648581
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of compressed SENSE (CS) in clinical settings on scan time reduction and image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from different anatomical regions were acquired, consisting of a standard protocol sequence (SS) and sequence accelerated with CS. Anonymized paired sequences were randomly displayed and rated by six blinded subspecialty radiologists. Side-by-side evaluation on perceived sharpness, perceived signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), lesion conspicuity, and artifacts were compared and scored on a five-point Likert scale, and individual image quality was evaluated on a four-point Likert scale. RESULTS: CS reduced overall scan time by 32% while maintaining acceptable MRI quality for all regions. The largest time savings were seen in the spine (mean = 68 seconds, 44% reduction) followed by the brain (mean = 86 seconds, 37% reduction). The sequence with maximum time savings was intracranial 3D-time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (202 seconds, 56% reduction). CS was mildly inferior to SS on perceived sharpness, perceived SNR, and lesion conspicuity (mean scores = 2.32-2.96, P < .001 [1: SS superior; 3: equivalent; 5: CS superior]). CS was equivalent to SS for joint and body scans on overall image quality (CS = 3.02-3.37, SS = 3.04-3.68, P > .05, [1: lowest quality and 4: highest quality]). The overall image quality of CS was slightly less for brain and spine scans (mean CS = 2.79-3.05, mean SS = 3.13-3.43, P = .021) but still diagnostic. Good overall clinical acceptance for CS (88%) was noted with full clinical acceptance for body scans (100%) and high acceptance for other regions (68%-95%). CONCLUSION: CS significantly reduced MR acquisition time while maintaining acceptable image quality. The implementation of CS may improve departmental workflows and enhance patient care.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Imaging, Three-Dimensional Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Acad Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Imaging, Three-Dimensional Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Acad Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article