Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Binocular vision and foraging in ducks, geese and swans (Anatidae).
Cantlay, Jennifer C; Martin, Graham R; McClelland, Stephanie C; Potier, Simon; O'Brien, Michelle F; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban; Bond, Alexander L; Portugal, Steven J.
Affiliation
  • Cantlay JC; Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
  • Martin GR; School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
  • McClelland SC; Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
  • Potier S; Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
  • O'Brien MF; Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT), Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK.
  • Fernández-Juricic E; Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  • Bond AL; Bird Group, Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Akeman Street, Tring, Hertfordshire HP23 6AP, UK.
  • Portugal SJ; Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
Proc Biol Sci ; 290(2006): 20231213, 2023 09 13.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37670586
Wide variation in visual field configuration across avian species is hypothesized to be driven primarily by foraging ecology and predator detection. While some studies of selected taxa have identified relationships between foraging ecology and binocular field characteristics in particular species, few have accounted for the relevance of shared ancestry. We conducted a large-scale, comparative analysis across 39 Anatidae species to investigate the relationship between the foraging ecology traits of diet or behaviour and binocular field parameters, while controlling for phylogeny. We used phylogenetic models to examine correlations between traits and binocular field characteristics, using unidimensional and morphometric approaches. We found that foraging behaviour influenced three parameters of binocular field size: maximum binocular field width, vertical binocular field extent, and angular separation between the eye-bill projection and the direction of maximum binocular field width. Foraging behaviour and body mass each influenced two descriptors of binocular field shape. Phylogenetic relatedness had minimal influence on binocular field size and shape, apart from vertical binocular field extent. Binocular field differences are associated with specific foraging behaviours, as related to the perceptual challenges of obtaining different food items from aquatic and terrestrial environments.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anseriformes / Ducks Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Proc Biol Sci Journal subject: BIOLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anseriformes / Ducks Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Proc Biol Sci Journal subject: BIOLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article