Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biofidelity assessment of the GHBMC M50-O in a rear-facing seat configuration during high-speed frontal impact.
Pradhan, Vikram V; Ramachandra, Rakshit; Stammen, Jason; Kracht, Corey; Moorhouse, Kevin; Bolte, John H; Kang, Yun-Seok.
Affiliation
  • Pradhan VV; Injury Biomechanics Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Ramachandra R; Transportation Research Center Inc, East Liberty, Ohio, USA.
  • Stammen J; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Vehicle Research and Test Center, East Liberty, Ohio, USA.
  • Kracht C; Production Engineering Department, TS Tech Americas, Inc, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, USA.
  • Moorhouse K; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Vehicle Research and Test Center, East Liberty, Ohio, USA.
  • Bolte JH; Injury Biomechanics Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Kang YS; Injury Biomechanics Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37680130
The objective of this study was to assess the biofidelity of the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) 50th male (M50-O) v6.0 seated in an upright (25-degree recline) all-belts-to-seat (ABTS) in a 56 km/h rear-facing frontal impact. The experimental boundary conditions from the post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) tests were replicated in the computational finite element (FE) environment. The performance of the rigidized FE ABTS model obtained from the original equipment manufacturer was validated via simulations using a Hybrid III FE model and comparison with experiments. Biofidelity of the GHBMC M50-O was evaluated using the most updated NHTSA Biofidelity Ranking System (BRS) method, where a biofidelity score under 2 indicates that the GHBMC response varies from the mean PMHS response by less than two standard deviations, suggesting good biofidelity. The GHBMC M50-O received an occupant response score and a seat loading score of 1.71 and 1.44, respectively. Head (BRS = 0.93) and pelvis (BRS = 1.29) resultant accelerations, and T-spine (avg. BRS = 1.55) and pelvis (BRS = 1.66) y-angular velocities were similar to the PMHS. The T-spine resultant accelerations (avg. BRS = 1.93) and head (BRS = 2.82), T1 (BRS = 2.10) and pelvis (BRS = 2.10) Z-displacements were underestimated in the GHBMC. Peak chest deflection in the anterior-posterior deflection in the GHBMC matched with the PMHS mean, however, the relative upward motion of abdominal contents and subsequent chest expansion were not observed in the GHBMC. Updates to the GHBMC M50-O towards improved thorax kinematics and mobility of abdominal organs should be considered to replicate PMHS characteristics more closely.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin Journal subject: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin Journal subject: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States