Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification of biomarkers for the early detection of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mohamed, Eithar; García Martínez, Daniel J; Hosseini, Mohammad-Salar; Yoong, Si Qi; Fletcher, Daniel; Hart, Simon; Guinn, Barbara-Ann.
Affiliation
  • Mohamed E; Centre for Biomedicine, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
  • García Martínez DJ; Department of Biotechnology, Pozuelo de Alarcón, University Francisco De Vitoria, Madrid, 28223, Spain.
  • Hosseini MS; Research Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  • Yoong SQ; Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
  • Fletcher D; Centre for Biomedicine, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
  • Hart S; Respiratory Medicine, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
  • Guinn BA; Centre for Biomedicine, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Carcinogenesis ; 45(1-2): 1-22, 2024 02 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38066655
ABSTRACT
Lung cancer (LC) causes few symptoms in the earliest stages, leading to one of the highest mortality rates among cancers. Low-dose computerised tomography (LDCT) is used to screen high-risk individuals, reducing the mortality rate by 20%. However, LDCT results in a high number of false positives and is associated with unnecessary follow-up and cost. Biomarkers with high sensitivities and specificities could assist in the early detection of LC, especially in patients with high-risk features. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragments and cancer antigen 125 have been found to be highly expressed during the later stages of LC but have low sensitivity in the earliest stages. We determined the best biomarkers for the early diagnosis of LC, using a systematic review of eight databases. We identified 98 articles that focussed on the identification and assessment of diagnostic biomarkers and achieved a pooled area under curve of 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.088), indicating that the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers when combined was excellent. Of the studies, 30 focussed on single/antigen panels, 22 on autoantibodies, 31 on miRNA and RNA panels, and 15 suggested the use of circulating DNA combined with CEA or neuron-specific enolase (NSE) for early LC detection. Verification of blood biomarkers with high sensitivities (Ciz1, exoGCC2, ITGA2B), high specificities (CYFR21-1, antiHE4, OPNV) or both (HSP90α, CEA) along with miR-15b and miR-27b/miR-21 from sputum may improve early LC detection. Further assessment is needed using appropriate sample sizes, control groups that include patients with non-malignant conditions, and standardised cut-off levels for each biomarker.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / MicroRNAs / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Carcinogenesis Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / MicroRNAs / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Carcinogenesis Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom