Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neighborhood-level social determinants of health measures independently predict receipt of living donor liver transplantation in the United States.
Kanneganti, Mounika; Byhoff, Elena; Serper, Marina; Olthoff, Kim M; Bittermann, Therese.
Affiliation
  • Kanneganti M; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Byhoff E; Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Serper M; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Olthoff KM; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Bittermann T; Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Liver Transpl ; 30(6): 618-627, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38100175
ABSTRACT
Disparities exist in the access to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States. However, the association of neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDoH) on the receipt of LDLT is not well-established. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2021 at centers performing LDLT using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, which was linked through patients' ZIP code to a set of 24 neighborhood-level SDoH measures from different data sources. Temporal trends and center differences in neighborhood Social Deprivation Index (SDI), a validated scale of socioeconomic deprivation ranging from 0 to 100 (0=least disadvantaged), were assessed by transplant type. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of increasing SDI on receipt of LDLT [vs. deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT)]. There were 51,721 DDLT and 4026 LDLT recipients at 59 LDLT-performing centers during the study period. Of the 24 neighborhood-level SDoH measures studied, the SDI was most different between the 2 transplant types, with LDLT recipients having lower SDI (ie, less socioeconomic disadvantage) than DDLT recipients (median SDI 37 vs. 47; p < 0.001). The median difference in SDI between the LDLT and DDLT groups significantly decreased from 13 in 2005 to 3 in 2021 ( p = 0.003). In the final model, the SDI quintile was independently associated with transplant type ( p < 0.001) with a threshold SDI of ~40, above which increasing SDI was significantly associated with reduced odds of LDLT (vs. reference SDI 1-20). As a neighborhood-level SDoH measure, SDI is useful for evaluating disparities in the context of LDLT. Center outreach efforts that aim to reduce disparities in LDLT could preferentially target US ZIP codes with SDI > 40.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Liver Transplantation / Living Donors / Healthcare Disparities / Social Determinants of Health Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Liver Transpl Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Liver Transplantation / Living Donors / Healthcare Disparities / Social Determinants of Health Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Liver Transpl Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States