Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors associated with cervical screening coverage: a longitudinal analysis of English general practices from 2013 to 2022.
Urwin, Sean; Gillibrand, Stephanie; Davies, Jennifer C; Crosbie, Emma J.
Affiliation
  • Urwin S; Health Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
  • Gillibrand S; Health Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
  • Davies JC; Gynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
  • Crosbie EJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 46(1): e43-e50, 2024 Feb 23.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148290
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cervical cancer remains an important global public health concern. Understanding the factors contributing to a decline in screening uptake in high-income countries is fundamental to improving screening rates. We aimed to identify general practice and patient characteristics related to cervical screening coverage in England between 2013 and 2022.

METHODS:

We analyzed a panel of 59 271 General Practice (GP)-years from 7881 GP practices. We applied correlated random effects regression to examine the association between cervical screening uptake and a rich set of GP practice workforce, size, quality and patient characteristics.

RESULTS:

Our results show a decline in overall screening rates from 2013/14 to 2021/22 from 77% to 72%. We find GP workforce and list size characteristics are strongly related to screening rates. An increase in 1 FTE Nurse per 1000 patients is related to a 1.94 percentage point increase in cervical screening rates. GP practices located in more deprived areas have lower screening rates.

CONCLUSIONS:

GP workforce and patient characteristics need to be considered by decision-makers to increase screening rates. The implementation of self-sampling screening methods could help address some of the current barriers to screening, including lack of healthcare staff and facilities.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / General Practice Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / General Practice Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom