Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Family planning service disruptions in the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from health facilities in seven low- and middle-income countries.
Karp, Celia; Williams, Kelsey; Wood, Shannon N; OlaOlorun, Funmilola M; Akilimali, Pierre; Guiella, Georges; Gichangi, Peter; Mosso, Rosine; Makumbi, Frederick; Anglewicz, Philip A; Moreau, Caroline.
Affiliation
  • Karp C; Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Williams K; Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Wood SN; Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • OlaOlorun FM; Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Akilimali P; Patrick Kayembe Research Center, Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  • Guiella G; Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP/University Joseph Ki-Zerbo), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  • Gichangi P; International Centre for Reproductive Health-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Mosso R; Department of Primary Care, Technical University of Mombasa, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Makumbi F; École Nationale Supérieure de Statistique et d'Economie Appliquee (ENSEA) of Abidjan, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
  • Anglewicz PA; Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Moreau C; Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 4(1): e0002435, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180911
ABSTRACT
Many speculated that COVID-19 would severely restrict the delivery of essential health services, including family planning (FP), but evidence of this impact is limited, partly due to data limitations. We use cross-sectional data collected from regional and national samples of health facilities (n = 2,610) offering FP across seven low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) between 2019 and 2021, with longitudinal data from four geographies, to examine reported disruptions to the FP service environment during COVID-19, assess how these disruptions varied according to health system characteristics, and evaluate how disruptions evolved throughout the first two years of the pandemic, relative to a pre-pandemic period. Findings show significant variation in the impact of COVID-19 on facility-based FP services across LMICs, with the largest disruptions to services occurring in Rajasthan, India, where COVID-19 cases were highest among geographies sampled, while in most sub-Saharan African settings there were limited disruptions impacting FP service availability, method provision, and contraceptive supplies. Facility-reported disruptions to care were not reflected in observed changes to the number of FP clients or types of stockouts experienced in the first two years of the pandemic. Public and higher-level facilities were generally less likely to experience COVID-19-related disruptions to FP services, suggesting policy mitigation measures-particularly those implemented among government-operated health facilities-may have been critical to ensuring sustained delivery of reproductive healthcare during the pandemic.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: PLOS Glob Public Health Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: PLOS Glob Public Health Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States