Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of rimegepant oral lyophilisate compared to best supportive care for the acute treatment of migraine in the UK.
Johnston, Karissa; Powell, Lauren C; Popoff, Evan; L'Italien, Gil J; Pawinski, Robert; Ahern, Aideen; Large, Sam; Tran, Thang; Jenkins, Aaron.
Affiliation
  • Johnston K; Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Powell LC; Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Popoff E; Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Vancouver, Canada.
  • L'Italien GJ; Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Pawinski R; Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.
  • Ahern A; Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.
  • Large S; Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.
  • Tran T; Pfizer Canada, Kirkland, Canada.
  • Jenkins A; Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 627-643, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38590236
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Migraine is the most common disabling headache disorder and is characterized by recurrent throbbing head pain and symptoms of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting. Rimegepant 75 mg, an oral lyophilisate calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist, is the first treatment approved for both the acute and preventative treatment of migraine, and the first acute therapy approved in over 20-years. The objective was to assess the cost-utility of rimegepant compared with best supportive care (BSC) in the UK, for the acute treatment of migraine in the adults with inadequate symptom relief after taking at least 2 triptans, or for whom triptans are contraindicated or not tolerated. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A de novo model was developed to estimate incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), structured as a decision tree followed by Markov model. Patients received rimegepant or BSC for a migraine attack and were assessed for response (pain relief at 2-h). Responders and non-responders followed different pain trajectories over 48-h cycles. Non-responders discontinued treatment while responders continued treatment for subsequent attacks, with a proportion discontinuing over time. Data sources included a post-hoc pooled analysis of the phase 3 acute rimegepant trials (NCT03235479, NCT03237845, NCT03461757), and a long-term safety study (NCT03266588). The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services over a 20-year time horizon.

RESULTS:

Rimegepant resulted in an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of £10,309 per QALY gained vs BSC, which is cost-effectiveness at a willingness to pay threshold of £30,000/QALY. Rimegepant generated +0.44 incremental QALYs and higher incremental lifetime costs (£4,492). Improved QALYs for rimegepant were a result of less time spent with severe and moderate headache pain.

CONCLUSION:

This study highlights the economic value of rimegepant which was found to be cost-effective for the acute treatment of migraine in adults unsuitable for triptans.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Piperidines / Pyridines / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Quality-Adjusted Life Years / Migraine Disorders Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Med Econ Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Piperidines / Pyridines / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Quality-Adjusted Life Years / Migraine Disorders Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Med Econ Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada