Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective charts for reporting, analysing, and evaluating disaster emergency response: a systematic review.
Hu, Pengwei; Li, Zhehao; Gui, Jing; Xu, Honglei; Fan, Zhongsheng; Wu, Fulei; Liu, Xiaorong.
Affiliation
  • Hu P; Department of Health Service, School of Public Health, Logistics University of People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, China.
  • Li Z; Department of Health Training, Second military medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
  • Gui J; Department of Health Training, Second military medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
  • Xu H; Department of Health Training, Second military medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
  • Fan Z; Department of Research, Characteristic Medical Center of People Armed Police, Tianjin, China.
  • Wu F; Medical Security Center, The No.983 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Forces of Chinese PLA, Tianjin, China.
  • Liu X; Department of Health Training, Second military medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 93, 2024 May 31.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816816
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Given the frequency of disasters worldwide, there is growing demand for efficient and effective emergency responses. One challenge is to design suitable retrospective charts to enable knowledge to be gained from disasters. This study provides comprehensive understanding of published retrospective chart review templates for designing and updating retrospective research.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review and text analysis of peer-reviewed articles and grey literature on retrospective chart review templates for reporting, analysing, and evaluating emergency responses. The search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science and pre-identified government and non-government organizational and professional association websites to find papers published before July 1, 2022. Items and categories were grouped and organised using visual text analysis. The study is registered in PROSPERO (374,928).

RESULTS:

Four index groups, 12 guidelines, and 14 report formats (or data collection templates) from 21 peer-reviewed articles and 9 grey literature papers were eligible. Retrospective tools were generally designed based on group consensus. One guideline and one report format were designed for the entire health system, 23 studies focused on emergency systems, while the others focused on hospitals. Five papers focused specific incident types, including chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, mass burning, and mass paediatric casualties. Ten papers stated the location where the tools were used. The text analysis included 123 categories and 1210 specific items; large heterogeneity was observed.

CONCLUSION:

Existing retrospective chart review templates for emergency response are heterogeneous, varying in type, hierarchy, and theoretical basis. The design of comprehensive, standard, and practicable retrospective charts requires an emergency response paradigm, baseline for outcomes, robust information acquisition, and among-region cooperation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disaster Planning Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Emerg Med Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disaster Planning Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Emerg Med Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: China