Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Expert Consensus on the Structure, Role, and Procedures of the Korea Expert Committee on Immunization Practices.
Kang, Cho Ryok; Ahn, Bin; Choe, Young June; Lim, So Yun; Kim, Han Wool; Kang, Hyun Mi; Park, Ji Young; Lee, Hyungmin; Lee, Seungho; Jeong, Sumin; Kwon, Sunghee; Choi, Eun Hwa.
Affiliation
  • Kang CR; Allergy and Immunology Center, and Department of Pediatrics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Ahn B; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Choe YJ; Allergy and Immunology Center, and Department of Pediatrics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. choey@korea.ac.kr.
  • Lim SY; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim HW; Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
  • Kang HM; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park JY; Department of Pediatrics, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.
  • Lee H; Division of Immunization Planning, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
  • Lee S; Division of Immunization Planning, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
  • Jeong S; Division of Immunization Planning, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
  • Kwon S; Division of Immunization Planning, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
  • Choi EH; Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(21): e166, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832476
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Korea Expert Committee on Immunization Practices (KECIP) is a key advisory body the government to develop guidelines and provide technical advisory activities on immunization policies in Korea. A recent policy study, inspired by global best practices, aims to enhance KECIP's functionality for providing timely and transparent recommendations in the face of evolving vaccine science and emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19.

METHODS:

This study reviewed the current status of KECIP and collected expert opinions through surveys and consultations. Among the 40 panel members who were surveyed, 19 responded to a questionnaire specifically designed to assess the potential areas of improvement within KECIP.

RESULTS:

The majority of respondents favored maintaining the current member count and emphasized the need for a subcommittee. Opinions varied on issues such as the length of KECIP's term, the representation of vaccine manufacturers' perspectives, and the chairperson's role. However, there was a consensus on the importance of expertise, transparency, and fair proceedings within the committee.

CONCLUSION:

This study underscores the pivotal role of KECIP in shaping national immunization policies, emphasizing the necessity for informed guidance amidst evolving vaccine science and emerging infectious diseases. Furthermore, it stressed the importance of enhancing KECIP's capacity to effectively address evolving public health challenges and maintain successful immunization programs in South Korea.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Consensus / COVID-19 Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: J Korean Med Sci Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Consensus / COVID-19 Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: J Korean Med Sci Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2024 Type: Article