Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The excitability of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials is not task-specific and spatially distinct from the contralateral motor hotspot.
Seusing, Nelly; Strauss, Sebastian; Fleischmann, Robert; Nafz, Christina; Groppa, Sergiu; Muthuraman, Muthuraman; Ding, Hao; Byblow, Winston D; Lotze, Martin; Grothe, Matthias.
Affiliation
  • Seusing N; Department of Neurology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Strauss S; Department of Neurology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Fleischmann R; Department of Neurology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Nafz C; Department of Neurology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Groppa S; Imaging and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Muthuraman M; Imaging and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Ding H; Neural Engineering with Signal Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (NESA-AI), Department of Neurology, University Medicine of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Byblow WD; Imaging and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Lotze M; Neural Engineering with Signal Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (NESA-AI), Department of Neurology, University Medicine of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Grothe M; Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Exp Brain Res ; 242(8): 1851-1859, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842754
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The role of ipsilateral descending motor pathways in voluntary movement of humans is still a matter of debate, with partly contradictory results. The aim of our study therefore was to examine the excitability of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs) regarding site and the specificity for unilateral and bilateral elbow flexion extension tasks.

METHODS:

MR-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping of the dominant hemisphere was performed in twenty healthy participants during tonic unilateral (iBB), bilateral homologous (bBB) or bilateral antagonistic elbow flexion-extension (iBB-cAE), the map center of gravity (CoG) and iMEP area from BB were obtained.

RESULTS:

The map CoG of the ipsilateral BB was located more anterior-laterally than the hotspot of the contralateral BB within the primary motor cortex, with a significant difference in CoG in iBB and iBB-cAE, but not bBB compared to the hotspot for the contralateral BB (each p < 0.05). However, different tasks had no effect on the size of the iMEPs.

CONCLUSION:

Our data demonstrated that excitability of ipsilateral and contralateral MEP differ spatially in a task-specific manner suggesting the involvement of different motor networks within the motor cortex.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Evoked Potentials, Motor / Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Functional Laterality / Motor Cortex Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Exp Brain Res Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Evoked Potentials, Motor / Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Functional Laterality / Motor Cortex Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Exp Brain Res Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany