Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of Deceased Donor Kidney Recipients From the Same Donor Based on Donor-Recipient Sex Discordance.
Swanson, Kurtis J; Aziz, Fahad; Garg, Neetika; Mandelbrot, Didier; Parajuli, Sandesh.
Affiliation
  • Swanson KJ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Aziz F; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Garg N; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Mandelbrot D; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Parajuli S; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 38(7): e15409, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033504
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients from the same donor with donor-recipient sex discordance have been studied with inconsistent results.

METHODS:

Adult DDKT where both kidneys from the same donor occurred at our center in two different recipients of different sexes were included. Outcomes were analyzed separately for male and female donors, based on the concordance or discordance between donor-recipient sex Male-male (M-m) versus Male to female (M-f) or vice versa, F-f versus F-m. Acute rejection (AR) and uncensored graft failure were primary outcomes of interest. The univariate and multivariate risks for AR and graft failure were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank tests.

RESULTS:

A total of 130 donors, 84 male and 46 female fulfilled our selection criteria and were transplanted in 260 recipients. With respect to the concordant groups (M-m or F-f), sex discordance was not significantly associated with the risk of rejection in multivariate analysis (M-f vs. M-m HR 1.15 [0.53-2.53, P = 0.72]; F-m vs. F-f HR 1.77 [0.71-4.39, P = 0.23]). Sex discordance was also not significantly associated with graft failure in multivariate analysis. Interestingly, risk factors for AR differed among male donors and female donors. The higher calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and nonwhite recipients were at increased risk for AR in F-m, but not in M-f.

CONCLUSIONS:

Donor-recipient sex discordance was not significantly associated with AR or graft failure. Risk factors for AR may differ across male and female donors.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tissue Donors / Kidney Transplantation / Graft Rejection / Graft Survival Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Transplant / Clin. transplant / Clinical transplantation Journal subject: TRANSPLANTE Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tissue Donors / Kidney Transplantation / Graft Rejection / Graft Survival Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Transplant / Clin. transplant / Clinical transplantation Journal subject: TRANSPLANTE Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States