Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Failure Rate of Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alzahrani, Manar; Bakhreibah, Sondus; Alharbi, Nada; Alamoudi, Lama; Halloul, Seba; Alamoudi, Sara; Alharthi, Raghad; Baghdadi, Salem; Alamoudi, Ahmed.
Affiliation
  • Alzahrani M; General Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Bakhreibah S; General Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Alharbi N; General Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Alamoudi L; General Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Halloul S; General Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Alamoudi S; General Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Alharthi R; General Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Baghdadi S; General Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Alamoudi A; Oral Biology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Cureus ; 16(7): e65506, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39188493
ABSTRACT
The present systematic review and meta-analysis has systematically reviewed and analyzed dental implant failure for the implants placed in the esthetic zone. An electronic database search was performed in PubMed and ScienceDirect, including a manual search through the references using appropriate keywords and the PICO (population, intervention, control, and outcomes) format for the inclusion criteria. A total of 11 relevant articles were included. The quality of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool while the quality of non-randomized studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Of the 11 articles included, 5 were RCTs, and 6 were non-randomized. The overall failure rate was found to be 2% (95% CI; 0.00-0.03%). The percentage marginal bone loss was estimated to be 1% (95% CI; 0.00 - 0.02%) and the mean and proportion pink esthetic scores were approximately 11.75 (0.43%) with 2% mid-facial soft tissue recession and the mesial and distal papillary recession was 0.02% and 0.01%, respectively. Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis, the rate of dental implant failure for implant placement in the esthetic zone was minimal. In addition, 1% proportional marginal bone loss and moderately high esthetic scores were found.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2024 Type: Article