Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The continuing debate: conservative or interventional therapy for unstable coronary artery disease.
Hillis, W S.
Affiliation
  • Hillis WS; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Glasgow, Gardiner Institute, United Kingdom.
Am J Cardiol ; 80(5A): 51E-54E, 1997 Sep 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9296471
ABSTRACT
A "look-and-act" approach, using a strategy of early intervention, and a "watchful waiting" approach, using medical therapy, are compared for the management of patients with unstable coronary artery disease (UCAD). Results from clinical trials are used to illustrate the advantages of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy and the problems associated with early intervention. Finally, a clinical management strategy for patients with UCAD is outlined. It is concluded that watchful waiting appears to be the most effective way of managing both patients and resources.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Disease Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 1997 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Disease Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 1997 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom