A comparative study on the diagnostic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided transperineal and transrectal prostate needle biopsy

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic efficacy between the transperineal and the transrectal prostate needly biopsy as the initial biopsy strategy for detection of prostate cancer.METHODS: A total of 179 patients with PSA of 2.5-20 ng/mL who underwent initial prostate needle biopsy were included. One hundred eight (108) patients underwent transrectal prostate needle biopsy (TRUS-BX) from March to December 2014, while 71 patients underwent transperineal prostate needle biopsy (TP-BX) from January 2015- August 2016. Descriptive statistics including mean, median and percentage were used for the patient demographics. Student's t-test was used to compare continuous variables between the two groups. X2 or Fisher's exact probability tests were used for categorical variables.RESULTS: The mean age of the patients who underwent the TP-BX and TRUS-BX were 66.10 years and 62 years respectively (p=0.0003). The mean prostate volumes were 44.10 mL and 42.39 mL (p=0.5405), while the mean PSA were 9.51 ng/mL and 9.21 ng/mL (p=0.6096) for the TP-BX and TRUS-BX,respectively. The TP-BX provided a greater overall cancer detection rate of 63.38% (45/71) compared to 35.19% (38/108) obtained from the TRUS-BX (pCONCLUSION: The transperineal prostate needle biopsy should be considered as the initial biopsy strategy for the detection of prostate cancer. The manifested advantages are the following: a) The overall cancer detection rate is significantly higher, b) The detection rate of clinically significant cancer is significantly greater, c) It provides a far more superior detection of exclusive anterior zone cancers which are often under detected or undetected with the current standard TRUS-BX and d) Complications are comparable, if not fewer than the current standard TRUS-BX.