Analysis of surgical and histopathological results of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with use of three or four robotic arms: an early series results
Int. braz. j. urol
; 48(3): 493-500, May-June 2022. tab, graf
Article
en En
|
LILACS-Express
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1385110
Biblioteca responsable:
BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether criteria exist to guide election between the use the three- or four-arm technique in robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) instead of just the surgeon's preference. Material andMethods:
We performed a retrospective review of 80 patients submitted to RPN from May 2016 to February 2020. The patients were divided into two groups of 40, the first submitted to the surgical procedure with use of three robotic arms and the second with four arms. The group division was performed independently of the complexity of the cases, age or gender of the patients and laterality of the renal lesions. Peri- and postoperative data were analyzed for comparison between the two groups.Results:
Both techniques had similar oncological outcomes (positive tumor margins), renal function preservation (warm ischemia time) and hemorrhagic complications (estimated blood loss and renal artery pseudoaneurysm), with a small difference in the need for blood transfusion, favoring the technique with three arms.Conclusions:
The two robotic partial nephrectomy techniques had similar oncological and postoperative outcomes, with minimal perioperative complications. The three-arm technique is safe and feasible regardless of the complexity and size of the tumor. Additionally, the use of the three-arm technique reduced surgery costs by US$ 413.00 per patient.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
LILACS
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Int. braz. j. urol
Asunto de la revista:
UROLOGIA
Año:
2022
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Brasil