Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies are the levonorgestrel intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) and endometrial ablation. The LNG-IUS can be applied easily by the general practitioner, which saves costs, but has considerable failure rates. As an alternative, endometrial ablation is also very effective, but this treatment has to be performed by a gynaecologist. Due to lack of direct comparison of LNG-IUS with endometrial ablation, there is no evidence based preferred advice for the use of one of these treatment possibilities. METHOD/

DESIGN:

A multicenter randomised controlled trial, organised in a network infrastructure in the Netherlands in which general practitioners and gynaecologists collaborate. DISCUSSON This study, considering both effectiveness and cost effectiveness of LNG-IUS versus endometrial ablation may well improve care for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch trial register, number NTR2984.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Levonorgestrel / Anticonceptivos Femeninos / Técnicas de Ablación Endometrial / Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Womens Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE DA MULHER Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Levonorgestrel / Anticonceptivos Femeninos / Técnicas de Ablación Endometrial / Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Womens Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE DA MULHER Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article