Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Home blood pressure measurement as a screening tool for hypertension in a web-based worksite health promotion programme.
Niessen, Maurice A J; van der Hoeven, Niels V; van den Born, Bert-Jan H; van Kalken, Coen K; Kraaijenhagen, Roderik A.
Afiliación
  • Niessen MA; 1 NIPED Research Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Hoeven NV; 1 NIPED Research Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Departments of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands n.v.vanderhoeven@amc.nl.
  • van den Born BJ; 2 Departments of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Kalken CK; 1 NIPED Research Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kraaijenhagen RA; 1 NIPED Research Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Public Health ; 24(5): 776-81, 2014 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24088704
BACKGROUND: Guidelines on home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) recommend taking at least 12 measurements. For screening purposes, however, it is preferred to reduce this number. We therefore derived and validated cut-off values to determine hypertension status after the first duplicate reading of a HBPM series in a web-based worksite health promotion programme. METHOD: Nine hundred forty-five employees were included in the derivation and 528 in the validation cohort, which was divided into a normal (n = 297) and increased cardiometabolic risk subgroup (n = 231), and a subgroup with a history of hypertension (n = 98). Six duplicate home measurements were collected during three consecutive days. Systolic and diastolic readings at the first duplicate measurement were used as predictors for hypertension in a multivariate logistic model. Cut-off values were determined using receiver operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS: Upper (≥ 150 or ≥ 95 mmHg) and lower limit (<135 and <80 mmHg) cut-off values were derived to confirm or reject presence of hypertension after one duplicate reading. The area under the curve was 0.94 (standard error 0.01, 95% confidence interval 0.93-0.95). In 62.5% of participants, hypertension status was determined, with 1.1% false positive and 4.7% false negatives. Performance was similar in participants with high and low cardiometabolic risk, but worse in participants with a history of hypertension (10.4% false negatives). CONCLUSION: One duplicate home reading is sufficient to accurately assess hypertension status in 62.5% of participants, leaving 37.5% in which the whole HBPM series needs to be completed. HBPM can thus be reliably used as screening tool for hypertension in a working population.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Autocuidado / Presión Sanguínea / Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud / Internet / Promoción de la Salud / Hipertensión Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Public Health Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Autocuidado / Presión Sanguínea / Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud / Internet / Promoción de la Salud / Hipertensión Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Public Health Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos