Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dietary inflammatory index and prostate cancer survival.
Zucchetto, Antonella; Gini, Andrea; Shivappa, Nitin; Hébert, James R; Stocco, Carmen; Dal Maso, Luigino; Birri, Silvia; Serraino, Diego; Polesel, Jerry.
Afiliación
  • Zucchetto A; Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy.
  • Gini A; Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy.
  • Shivappa N; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Hébert JR; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Stocco C; Connecting Health Innovations LLC, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Dal Maso L; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Birri S; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Serraino D; Connecting Health Innovations LLC, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Polesel J; Venetian Cancer Registry, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy.
Int J Cancer ; 139(11): 2398-404, 2016 Dec 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27242333
ABSTRACT
Systemic inflammatory status has been reported to impact survival of prostate cancer (PCa) patients; however, evidence is lacking on whether the inflammatory potential of diet can influence prognosis of PCa patients. To investigate the association between a dietary inflammatory index (DII) and PCa survival, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including 726 men with PCa originally enrolled, between 1995 and 2002, in an Italian case-control study. Information on diet and Gleason score was collected at PCa diagnosis. DII was derived from a food frequency questionnaire using a validated algorithm. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of death with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Fine-Gray model. DII scores were not significantly associated with all-cause mortality of PCa patients (HR highest vs. lowest DII tertile = 1.25; 95% CI 0.86-1.83). However, considerable heterogeneity emerged according to Gleason score (p < 0.01) no associations emerged among men with Gleason score 2-6 PCa; whereas, among patients with Gleason score 7-10 PCa, DII was directly associated with both all-cause and PCa-specific mortality (HR highest vs. lowest DII tertile 2.78; 95% CI 1.41-5.48; and 4.01; 95% CI 1.25-12.86; respectively). Among patients with Gleason score 7-10 PCa, ten-year all-cause survival probabilities were 58% (95% CI 47-67%) for highest and 78% (95% CI 67-86%) for lowest DII tertile. Study findings support the hypothesis that diet, through its inflammatory potential, may influence the prognosis of patients with more aggressive PCa. Dietary interventions aimed at decreasing inflammation may be considered to improve survival of men with PCa.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Dieta Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cancer Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Dieta Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cancer Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia