Small-sided soccer games on sand are more physically demanding but less technically specific compared to games on artificial turf.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of sand has been suggested as fitness-enhancing surface in field-based team sports. However, concerns have arisen in regard whether physical responses associated to sand training are sport-specific. We compared physical and technical demands during small-sided soccer games (4 vs. 4 + goalkeeper; SSGs) played on artificial turf and on sand. METHODS: Movement patterns, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and technical parameters were obtained from eight adult male soccerers (20.1±1.0 years, 176±4 cm and 70.1±2.0 kg) using Global Positioning Systems, Visual Analogue Scale questionnaires, and notational analysis. RESULTS: High-intensity actions (high intensity running, high intensity activities), low changes of speed, as well as peak and average speed were higher on artificial turf (P<0.05; effect sizes (ES) 0.41 to 0.82). In contrast, time spent by jogging as well as high and maximum changes of speed was higher on sand (P<0.05; ES 0.59 to 0.82). Moreover, players perceived more demanding to play on sand (P<0.05; ES=0.72). Rating of successful actions was higher during turf SSGs than sand SSGs (P<0.05; ES 0.44 to 0.73), whereas actions requiring lifting the ball were higher on sand (P<0.05; ES 0.47 to 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sand can be considered as complemental to on-turf soccer training, when the training goal is to tax lower limb muscle strength or to require high-ball situations. Nonetheless, sand training is not appropriate when the achievement of maximal speed is desired. Further research should clarify the suitability of sand training within soccer conditioning programs.