Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Quantile Analysis of Plateau and Driving Pressures: Effects on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Receiving Lung-Protective Ventilation.
Villar, Jesús; Martín-Rodríguez, Carmen; Domínguez-Berrot, Ana M; Fernández, Lorena; Ferrando, Carlos; Soler, Juan A; Díaz-Lamas, Ana M; González-Higueras, Elena; Nogales, Leonor; Ambrós, Alfonso; Carriedo, Demetrio; Hernández, Mónica; Martínez, Domingo; Blanco, Jesús; Belda, Javier; Parrilla, Dácil; Suárez-Sipmann, Fernando; Tarancón, Concepción; Mora-Ordoñez, Juan M; Blanch, Lluís; Pérez-Méndez, Lina; Fernández, Rosa L; Kacmarek, Robert M.
Afiliación
  • Villar J; 1CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. 2Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. 3Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain. 4Intensive Care Unit, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain. 5Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain. 6Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain. 7Intensive Care Uni
Crit Care Med ; 45(5): 843-850, 2017 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28252536
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The driving pressure (plateau pressure minus positive end-expiratory pressure) has been suggested as the major determinant for the beneficial effects of lung-protective ventilation. We tested whether driving pressure was superior to the variables that define it in predicting outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN:

A secondary analysis of existing data from previously reported observational studies.

SETTING:

A network of ICUs. PATIENTS We studied 778 patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS:

None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

We assessed the risk of hospital death based on quantiles of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, plateau pressure, and driving pressure evaluated at 24 hours after acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis while ventilated with standardized lung-protective ventilation. We derived our model using individual data from 478 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients and assessed its replicability in a separate cohort of 300 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure had no impact on mortality. We identified a plateau pressure cut-off value of 29 cm H2O, above which an ordinal increment was accompanied by an increment of risk of death. We identified a driving pressure cut-off value of 19 cm H2O where an ordinal increment was accompanied by an increment of risk of death. When we cross tabulated patients with plateau pressure less than 30 and plateau pressure greater than or equal to 30 with those with driving pressure less than 19 and driving pressure greater than or equal to 19, plateau pressure provided a slightly better prediction of outcome than driving pressure in both the derivation and validation cohorts (p < 0.0000001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Plateau pressure was slightly better than driving pressure in predicting hospital death in patients managed with lung-protective ventilation evaluated on standardized ventilator settings 24 hours after acute respiratory distress syndrome onset.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Respiración Artificial / Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Respiración Artificial / Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article