Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and CT Colonography Screening: Patients' Experience with and Factors for Undergoing Screening-Insight from the Proteus Colon Trial.
Radiology
; 286(3): 873-883, 2018 03.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-29040021
ABSTRACT
Purpose To compare the acceptability of computed tomographic (CT) colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening and the factors predicting CT colonographic screening participation, targeting participants in a randomized screening trial. Materials and Methods Eligible individuals aged 58 years (n = 1984) living in Turin, Italy, were randomly assigned to be invited to screening for colorectal cancer with FS or CT colonography. After individuals who had died or moved away (n = 28) were excluded, 264 of 976 (27.0%) underwent screening with FS and 298 of 980 (30.4%) underwent CT colonography. All attendees and a sample of CT colonography nonattendees (n = 299) were contacted for a telephone interview 3-6 months after invitation for screening, and screening experience and factors affecting participation were investigated. Odds ratios (ORs) were computed by means of multivariable logistic regression. Results For the telephone interviews, 239 of 264 (90.6%) FS attendees, 237 of 298 (79.5%) CT colonography attendees, and 182 of 299 (60.9%) CT colonography nonattendees responded. The percentage of attendees who would recommend the test to friends or relatives was 99.1% among FS and 93.3% among CT colonography attendees. Discomfort associated with bowel preparation was higher among CT colonography than FS attendees (OR, 2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47, 5.24). CT colonography nonattendees were less likely to be men (OR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.18, 0.71), retired (OR, 0.31; 95% CI 0.13, 0.75), to report regular physical activity (OR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.20, 0.70), or to have read the information leaflet (OR, 0.18; 95% CI 0.08, 0.41). They were more likely to mention screening-related anxiety (mild OR, 6.30; 95% CI 2.48, 15.97; moderate or severe OR, 3.63; 95% CI 1.87, 7.04), erroneous beliefs about screening (OR, 32.15; 95% CI 6.26, 165.19), or having undergone a recent fecal occult blood test (OR, 13.69; 95% CI 3.66, 51.29). Conclusion CT colonography and FS screening are well accepted, but further reducing the discomfort from bowel preparation may increase CT colonography screening acceptability. Negative attitudes, erroneous beliefs about screening, and organizational barriers are limiting screening uptake; all these factors are modifiable and therefore potentially susceptible to interventions. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Neoplasias Colorrectales
/
Sigmoidoscopía
/
Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada
/
Detección Precoz del Cáncer
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Screening_studies
Límite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Región como asunto:
Europa
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Radiology
Año:
2018
Tipo del documento:
Article