Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of high definition colonoscopy versus standard definition: does it affect polyp detection rate?
Richardson, John; Thaventhiran, Anthony; Mackenzie, Hugh; Stubbs, Benjamin.
Afiliación
  • Richardson J; Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, DT1 2JY, UK. johnrcr@mac.com.
  • Thaventhiran A; Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, DT1 2JY, UK.
  • Mackenzie H; Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, DT1 2JY, UK.
  • Stubbs B; Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, DT1 2JY, UK.
Surg Endosc ; 32(6): 2676-2682, 2018 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29101563
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Polyp detection rate (PDR) during lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (LGIE) is of clinical importance. Detecting adenomatous polyps early in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence can halt disease progression, enabling treatment at a favourable stage. High definition colonoscopy (HDC) has been used in our hospital alongside standard definition equipment since 2011. We aim to determine what affect the use of HDC has on PDR.

METHODS:

Post-hoc analysis of a prospectively maintained database on all patients undergoing LGIE was performed (01/01/2012-31/12/2015), n = 15,448. Analysis tested the primary outcome of HD's effect on PDR across LGIE and secondary outcome stratified this by endoscopist group (Physician (PE), Surgeon (SE) and Nurse Endoscopist (NE)).

RESULTS:

Of 15,448 patients, 1353 underwent HDC. Unmatched analysis showed PDR increased by 5.3% in this group (p < 0.001). Matched analysis considered 2288 patients from the total cohort (1144 HDC) and showed an increase of 1% in PDR with HDC (p = 0.578). Further unmatched analysis stratified by endoscopist groups showed a PDR increase of 1.8% (p = 0.375), 5.4% (p = 0.008) and 4.6% (p = 0.021) by PE, SE and NE respectively. Matched analysis demonstrated an increase of 1% (p = 0.734) and 1.5% (p = 0.701) amongst PE and NE, with a decrease of 0.6% (p = 0.883) by SE.

CONCLUSION:

The introduction of HDC increased PDR across all LGIE in our hospital, though this was not clinically significant. This marginal benefit was present across all endoscopist groups with no group benefiting over another in matched analysis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pólipos del Colon / Colonoscopía / Pólipos Adenomatosos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pólipos del Colon / Colonoscopía / Pólipos Adenomatosos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido