Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy: Where Are We Now? Five Years of a Single-Center Experience.
Patrucco, Filippo; Gavelli, Francesco; Daverio, Matteo; Antonini, Cleto; Boldorini, Renzo; Casadio, Caterina; Balbo, Piero E.
Afiliación
  • Patrucco F; Department of Translational Medicine, Pneumology Unit U, University of Piemonte Orientale, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Vercelli, Italy. filippo.patrucco@gmail.com.
  • Gavelli F; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Department, University of Piemonte Orientale, AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara, C.so Mazzini 18, 28100, Novara, Italy. filippo.patrucco@gmail.com.
  • Daverio M; Department of Translational Medicine, Emergency Medicine Unit, University of Piemonte Orientale, AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Novara, Italy.
  • Antonini C; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Department, University of Piemonte Orientale, AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara, C.so Mazzini 18, 28100, Novara, Italy.
  • Boldorini R; Department of Emergency Acceptance, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Novara, Italy.
  • Casadio C; Department of Translational Medicine, Pathology Unit, University of Piemonte Orientale, AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Novara, Italy.
  • Balbo PE; Surgical Department, Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Piemonte Orientale, AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Novara, Italy.
Lung ; 196(6): 721-727, 2018 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30209566
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Electromagnetic navigation (ENB) is a guidance tool used in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and masses. Its diagnostic yield is highly variable (38-71%) and a recent study has put in doubt the role of ENB in sampling SPNs in a real-life setting. The aim of this study is to describe the 5-year experience of our center with ENB, analyzing the population, possible confounding factors, and the diagnostic yield and accuracy of this technique.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective observational study including all consecutive patients who underwent ENB for SPNs and masses from January 2011 to December 2015.

RESULTS:

We included 113 patients; 79% had SPNs, 21% masses. The majority were localized in the upper and middle lobes (80%) and 61% presented a bronchus sign. 54% of the patients had a previous negative fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy. ENB achieved the diagnosis in 78 patients (69%) with 64 malignant and 14 were benign lesions. The diagnostic yield and accuracy of ENB were respectively 0.69 and 0.76. The only factor influencing the ability to reach a diagnosis was the presence of bronchus sign (p = 0.002). No procedural complications were reported.

CONCLUSION:

ENB is a safe procedure with a similar diagnostic yield in the real-life and research setting. Bronchus sign is an important factor in determining the diagnostic yield. ENB efficacy can be maximized by expertise and by a careful selection of each case.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Broncoscopía / Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario / Fenómenos Electromagnéticos / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Lung Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Broncoscopía / Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario / Fenómenos Electromagnéticos / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Lung Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia