Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation (PACT) Score Identifies High Risk Patients in Pediatric Renal Transplantation.
Freischlag, Kyle W; Chen, Vivian; Nagaraj, Shashi K; Chua, Annabelle N; Chen, Dongfeng; Wigfall, Delbert R; Foreman, John W; Gbadegesin, Rasheed; Vikraman, Deepak; Chambers, Eileen T.
Afiliación
  • Freischlag KW; School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Chen V; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Nagaraj SK; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Chua AN; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Chen D; Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Wigfall DR; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Foreman JW; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Gbadegesin R; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Vikraman D; Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Chambers ET; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Front Pediatr ; 7: 102, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30972314
ABSTRACT

Background:

Currently, there is no standardized approach for determining psychosocial readiness in pediatric transplantation. We examined the utility of the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation (PACT) to identify pediatric kidney transplant recipients at risk for adverse clinical outcomes.

Methods:

Kidney transplant patients <21-years-old transplanted at Duke University Medical Center between 2005 and 2015 underwent psychosocial assessment by a social worker with either PACT or unstructured interview, which were used to determine transplant candidacy. PACT assessed candidates on a scale of 0 (poor candidate) to 4 (excellent candidate) in areas of social support, psychological health, lifestyle factors, and understanding. Demographics and clinical outcomes were analyzed by presence or absence of PACT and further characterized by high (≥3) and low (≤2) scores.

Results:

Of 54 pediatric patients, 25 (46.3%) patients underwent pre-transplant evaluation utilizing PACT, while 29 (53.7%) were not evaluated with PACT. Patients assessed with PACT had a significantly lower percentage of acute rejection (16.0 vs. 55.2%, p = 0.007). After adjusting for HLA mismatch, a pre-transplant PACT score was persistently associated with lower odds of acute rejection (Odds Ratio 0.119, 95% Confidence Interval 0.027-0.52, p = 0.005). In PACT subsection analysis, the lack of family availability (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.97, p = 0.047) and risk for psychopathology (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.87, p = 0.025) were associated with a low PACT score and post-transplant non-adherence.

Conclusions:

Our study highlights the importance of standardized psychosocial assessments and the potential use of PACT in risk stratifying pre-transplant candidates.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Pediatr Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Pediatr Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos