Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Public Health Importance of Invasive Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Surveillance in 8 US Counties, 2016.
Jackson, Kelly A; Gokhale, Runa H; Nadle, Joelle; Ray, Susan M; Dumyati, Ghinwa; Schaffner, William; Ham, David C; Magill, Shelley S; Lynfield, Ruth; See, Isaac.
Afiliación
  • Jackson KA; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Gokhale RH; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Nadle J; California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland.
  • Ray SM; Georgia Emerging Infections Program and the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur.
  • Dumyati G; University of Rochester Medical Center, New York.
  • Schaffner W; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Ham DC; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Magill SS; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Lynfield R; Minnesota Emerging Infections Program, Saint Paul.
  • See I; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Clin Infect Dis ; 70(6): 1021-1028, 2020 03 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31245810
BACKGROUND: Public health and infection control prevention and surveillance efforts in the United States have primarily focused on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We describe the public health importance of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) in selected communities. METHODS: We analyzed Emerging Infections Program surveillance data for invasive S. aureus (SA) infections (isolated from a normally sterile body site) in 8 counties in 5 states during 2016. Cases were considered healthcare-associated if culture was obtained >3 days after hospital admission; if associated with dialysis, hospitalization, surgery, or long-term care facility (LTCF) residence within 1 year prior; or if a central venous catheter was present ≤2 days prior. Incidence per 100 000 census population was calculated, and a multivariate logistic regression model with random intercepts was used to compare MSSA risk factors with those of MRSA. RESULTS: Invasive MSSA incidence (31.3/100 000) was 1.8 times higher than MRSA (17.5/100 000). Persons with MSSA were more likely than those with MRSA to have no underlying medical conditions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-3.39) and less likely to have prior hospitalization (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82) or LTCF residence (aOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.29-0.47). MSSA accounted for 59.7% of healthcare-associated cases and 60.1% of deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although MRSA tended to be more closely associated with healthcare exposures, invasive MSSA is a substantial public health problem in the areas studied. Public health and infection control prevention efforts should consider MSSA prevention in addition to MRSA.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Estafilocócicas / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Georgia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Estafilocócicas / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Georgia