Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are patients afraid to go home? Disposition preferences after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke.
Chang, Bernard P; Cornelius, Talea; Willey, Joshua; Edmondson, Donald; Elkind, Mitchell Sv; Kronish, Ian M.
Afiliación
  • Chang BP; Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA bpc2103@columbia.edu.
  • Cornelius T; Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Willey J; Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Edmondson D; Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Elkind MS; Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Kronish IM; Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Emerg Med J ; 37(8): 486-488, 2020 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31992569
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recent evidence suggests clinical equipoise for managing transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (TIAMS) either via discharge from the emergency department (ED) with rapid outpatient follow-up or inpatient admission. Understanding patient preferences may guide decision-making around disposition after TIAMS that can lead to higher patient satisfaction and adherence. Psychological distress, particularly a sense of vulnerability (eg, 'threat perception') is associated with adverse psychological outcomes following TIAMS and may influence patient disposition preference. We hypothesised patients with higher threat perceptions in the ED would prefer inpatient admission versus early discharge with rapid outpatient follow-up.

METHODS:

This was a planned secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study of ED patients with suspected TIAMS (defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≤5). Patients reported disposition preferences and completed a validated scale of threat perception while in the ED (score range 1-4).

RESULTS:

147 TIAMS patients were evaluated (mean age 59.7±15.4, 45.6% female, 39.5% Hispanic, median NIHSS=1, IQR 0, 3). A majority of patients (98, 66.7%) preferred inpatient admission compared with discharge from the ED. Overall threat scores were median 1.0 (IQR 0.43, 1.68). Those preferring admission had similar threat scores compared with those who preferred early disposition (median 1.00, IQR 0.43, 1.57) versus 1.00, (IQR 0.49, 1.68); p=0.40). In a model adjusted for demographic characteristics, threat perceptions remained unassociated with disposition preference.

CONCLUSION:

Overall, two-thirds of TIAMS patients preferred inpatient admission over discharge. Disposition preference was not associated with higher threat perception in the ED. Further research examining potential drivers of patient disposition preferences may inform patient discussions and optimise patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Alta del Paciente / Ataque Isquémico Transitorio / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Prioridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Alta del Paciente / Ataque Isquémico Transitorio / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Prioridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos