Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Absolute and Relative Reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold Assessments in the Shoulder Muscles of Participants With and Without Unilateral Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.
Nascimento, José Diego Sales do; Alburquerque-Sendín, Francisco; Vigolvino, Lorena Passos; Oliveira, Wandemberg Fortunato de; Sousa, Catarina de Oliveira.
Afiliación
  • Nascimento JDSD; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
  • Alburquerque-Sendín F; Department of Sociosanitary Sciences, Radiology and Physical Medicine, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain; Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
  • Vigolvino LP; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
  • Oliveira WF; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
  • Sousa CO; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Electronic address: sousa.catarinaoliveira@gmail.com.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 43(1): 57-67, 2020 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32061418
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative and absolute reliability of the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in the shoulder muscles of participants with and without unilateral subacromial impingement syndrome.

METHODS:

Study of intraday intra- and interrater and interday intrarater reliability. Fifty-two participants symptomatic for unilateral subacromial impingement syndrome were divided into 2 groups (SG1 and SG2) of 26 participants each, and 26 participants asymptomatic for shoulder pain took part in the study. Two raters assessed the PPT in 4 shoulder muscles. Each rater assessed symptomatic (SG1) and asymptomatic participants twice on the same day, and one of the raters on 2 different days (SG2). The intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement (SEM95% and SEM%), and minimum detectable change (MDC95% and MDC%) were calculated.

RESULTS:

Relative reliability was good or excellent for all assessments, as well as for both groups and raters (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.87-0.98). The SEM95% values for intra- and interday intrarater measures were between 0.43 and 1.50 kgf/cm2 and SEM% between 6.76 and 12.86%, whereas MDC95% values ranged from 0.60 to 2.12 kgf/cm2 and MDC% from 9.56 to 18.18%. In interrater measures, SEM95% was between 0.58 and 0.77 kgf/cm2 and SEM% between 10.10% and 13.71%, whereas MDC95% varied from 0.82 to 1.08 kgf/cm2 and MDC% from 14.29% to 19.39%.

CONCLUSION:

Relative reliability was good or excellent. This study presents absolute reliability values that could be used as a reference in the clinical use of PPT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dimensión del Dolor / Umbral del Dolor / Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro / Dolor de Hombro Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dimensión del Dolor / Umbral del Dolor / Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro / Dolor de Hombro Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil