Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment times in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant vs adjuvant chemotherapy: Is efficiency a benefit of preoperative chemotherapy?
Melchior, Nicole M; Sachs, Darren B; Gauvin, Gabrielle; Chang, Cecilia; Wang, Chihsiung E; Sigurdson, Elin R; Daly, John M; Aggon, Allison A; Hayes, Shelly B; Obeid, Elias I; Bleicher, Richard J.
Afiliación
  • Melchior NM; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Sachs DB; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Gauvin G; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Chang C; Biostatistics Core, NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA.
  • Wang CE; Biostatistics Core, NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA.
  • Sigurdson ER; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Daly JM; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Aggon AA; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Hayes SB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Obeid EI; Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Bleicher RJ; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cancer Med ; 9(8): 2742-2751, 2020 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32096915
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Delays in times to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy impair survival in breast cancer patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) confers equivalent survival to adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), but it remains unknown which approach facilitates faster initiation and completion of treatment. METHODS: Women ≥18 years old with nonrecurrent, noninflammatory, clinical stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who underwent both surgery and chemotherapy were reviewed from the National Cancer Database. RESULTS: Among 155 606 women overall, 28 241 patients received NAC and 127 365 patients received AC. NAC patients had higher clinical T and N stages (35.8% T3/4 vs 4.9% T3/4; 14.4% N2/3 vs 3.7% N2/3). After adjusting for stage and other factors, NAC patients had longer times to begin treatment (36.1 vs 35.4 days adjusted, P = .15), and took significantly longer to start radiotherapy (240.8 vs 218.2 days adjusted, P < .0001), and endocrine therapy (301.6 vs 275.7 days adjusted, P < .0001). Unplanned readmissions (1.2% vs 1.7%), 30-day mortality (0.04% vs 0.01%), and 90-day mortality (0.30% vs 0.08%) were all low and clinically insignificant between NAC and AC. CONCLUSION: Compared to patients receiving AC, those receiving NAC do not start treatment sooner. In addition, patients receiving NAC do not complete treatment faster. Although there are clear indications for administering NAC vs AC, rapidity of treatment should not be considered a benefit of giving chemotherapy preoperatively.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Cuidados Preoperatorios / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Quimioterapia Adyuvante / Terapia Neoadyuvante Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Med Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Cuidados Preoperatorios / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Quimioterapia Adyuvante / Terapia Neoadyuvante Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Med Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos