Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to mental health services utilisation in Portugal - results from the National Mental Health Survey.
Silva, Manuela; Antunes, Ana; Azeredo-Lopes, Sofia; Cardoso, Graça; Xavier, Miguel; Saraceno, Benedetto; Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel.
Afiliación
  • Silva M; Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Antunes A; Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Azeredo-Lopes S; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Cardoso G; Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Xavier M; Chronic Diseases Research Centre (CEDOC), Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Saraceno B; Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Caldas-de-Almeida JM; Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
J Ment Health ; 31(4): 453-461, 2022 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32202450
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The treatment gap for mental disorders remains a challenge worldwide. Identifying reasons for nontreatment may contribute to reducing this gap.

AIMS:

To evaluate sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with use and barriers to treatment in Portugal.

METHOD:

Data from the 2009 National Mental Health Survey were used. Participants reported 12-month treatment and reasons for nontreatment. Logistic regression models analysed the association between sociodemographic (education; employment; income; marital status) and clinical variables (mental disorder diagnosis; disability) with treatment and type of barriers (low perceived need; structural; attitudinal).

RESULTS:

The majority of participants with a mental disorder was not treated. Treatment was more common among participants with mood disorders (OR = 4.19; 95% CI 2.72-6.46), and disability (OR = 2.43; 95% CI 1.33-4.46), and less common among single participants (OR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.20-0.70) and those with basic/secondary education (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.24-0.73). Attitudinal barriers were more likely among participants with none/primary (OR = 2.90; 95% CI 1.42-5.90) and basic/secondary education (OR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.01-2.85), and less likely among those with substance use disorders (OR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.10-0.70). Low perceived need was higher among single people (OR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.01-3.08), and lower among those with anxiety (OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.28-0.90) and mood disorders (OR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.09-0.30). Unemployed participants had higher odds of reporting structural barriers (OR = 3.76; 95% CI 1.29-10.92).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study identifies factors associated with nontreatment, providing useful evidence to develop policies and effective interventions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Mentales / Servicios de Salud Mental Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Ment Health Asunto de la revista: PSICOLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Mentales / Servicios de Salud Mental Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Ment Health Asunto de la revista: PSICOLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal