Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis: MRI in clinical practice.
Tomassini, Valentina; Sinclair, Audrey; Sawlani, Vijay; Overell, James; Pearson, Owen R; Hall, Julie; Guadagno, Joe.
Afiliación
  • Tomassini V; Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), University of Chieti-Pescara "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy. valentina.tomassini@unich.it.
  • Sinclair A; Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK. valentina.tomassini@unich.it.
  • Sawlani V; Department of Neuroradiology, St Georges Hospital, London, UK. Audrey.Sinclair@stgeorges.nhs.uk.
  • Overell J; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Pearson OR; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Hall J; Morriston Hospital, Swansea and Neath Port Talbot Hospitals, Port Talbot, UK.
  • Guadagno J; Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, UK.
J Neurol ; 267(10): 2917-2925, 2020 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32472179
BACKGROUND: Recent changes in the understanding and management of multiple sclerosis (MS) have increased the role of MRI in supporting diagnosis and disease monitoring. However, published guidelines on the use of MRI in MS do not translate easily into different clinical settings and considerable variation in practice remains. Here, informed by published guidelines for the use of MRI in MS, we identified a clinically informative MRI protocol applicable in a variety of clinical settings, from district general hospitals to tertiary centres. METHODS: MS specialists geographically representing the UK National Health Service and with expertise in MRI examined existing guidelines on the use of MRI in MS and identification of challenges in their applications in various clinical settings informed the formulation of a feasible MRI protocol. RESULTS: We identified a minimum set of MRI information, based on clinical relevance, as well as on applicability to various clinical settings. This informed the selection of MRI acquisitions for scanning protocols, differentiated on the basis of their purpose and stage of the disease, and indication of timing for scans. Advice on standardisation of MRI requests and reporting, and proposed timing and frequency of MRI scans were generated. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed MRI protocol can adapt to a range of clinical settings, aiding the impetus towards standardisation of practice and offering an example of research-informed service improvement to support optimisation of resources. Other neurological conditions, where a gap still exists between published guidelines and their clinical implementation, may benefit from this same approach.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Esclerosis Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Esclerosis Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia