Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of diagnostic laparoscopy for trauma at a high-volume level one center.
Koganti, Deepika; Hazen, Benjamin J; Dente, Christopher J; Nguyen, Jonathan; Gelbard, Rondi B.
Afiliación
  • Koganti D; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 525 Glen Iris Dr. NE #2532, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA. deepika.koganti@emory.edu.
  • Hazen BJ; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 525 Glen Iris Dr. NE #2532, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA.
  • Dente CJ; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 525 Glen Iris Dr. NE #2532, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA.
  • Nguyen J; Department of Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Gelbard RB; Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 35(6): 2667-2670, 2021 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32500457
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The role of minimally invasive surgery in trauma has continued to evolve over the past 20 years. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) has become increasingly utilized for the diagnosis and management of both blunt and penetrating injuries.

OBJECTIVE:

While the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy has been established for penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma, it remains a controversial tool for other injury patterns due to the concern for complications and missed injuries. We sought to examine the role of laparoscopy for the initial management of traumatic injuries at our urban Level 1 trauma center.

METHODS:

All trauma patients who underwent DL for blunt or penetrating trauma between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, indications for DL, injuries identified, rate of conversion to open surgery, and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS:

A total of 316 patients were included in the cohort. The mean age was 34.9 years old (± 13.7), mean GCS 14 (± 3), and median ISS 10 (4-18). A total of 110/316 patients (35%) sustained blunt injury and 206/316 patients (65%) sustained penetrating injury. Indications for DL included evaluation for peritoneal violation (152/316, 48%), free fluid without evidence of solid organ injury (52/316, 16%), evaluation of bowel injury (42/316, 13%), and evaluation for diaphragmatic injury (35/316, 11%). Of all DLs, 178/316 (56%) were negative for injury requiring intervention, which was 58% of blunt cases and 55% of penetrating cases. There were no missed injuries noted. Average hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for patients that underwent DL vs conversion to open exploration (2.2 days vs. 4.5 days, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

In this single institution, retrospective study, the high volume of cases appears to show that DL is a reliable tool for detecting injury and avoiding potential negative or non-therapeutic laparotomies. However, when injuries were present, the high rate of conversion to open exploration suggests that its utility for therapeutic intervention warrants further study.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos Torácicos / Heridas Penetrantes / Laparoscopía / Traumatismos Abdominales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos Torácicos / Heridas Penetrantes / Laparoscopía / Traumatismos Abdominales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos